Indexed in Journament

archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the national academy of neuropsychologists

ISSN 1873-5843· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,778 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
79 Articles
Scores higher than 36% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name arch clin neuropsychol
Abbreviated Name arch clin neuropsychol
ISSN 1873-5843

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 100.0
Innovation 15.0
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 9.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 100.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 15.0 31.2
Community Impact 7.1 13.4
Content Distribution 9.2 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (79)

2020
Cross-Cultural Comparison of Rural Healthy Adults: Russian and American Groups.
Melikyan, Zarui A;Puente, Antonio E;Agranovich, Anna V;
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
Confabulations on Time: Relationship between Confabulations and Timing Deviations in Alzheimer's Disease.
El Haj, Mohamad;Larøi, Frank;
325 views DOI Abstract
1999
Normative Data Stratified by Age and Education for Two Measures of Verbal Fluency: FAS and Animal Naming
Tom N. Tombaugh, J. Kozak, Laura Rees
202 views DOI Abstract
2007
Assessment of executive functions: Review of instruments and identification of critical issues
Randolph C. H. Chan, David Shum, Timothea Toulopoulou, Eric Chen
44 views DOI Abstract
2005
Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessityNAN Policy & Planning Committee
Sarah B. Bush, Ronald M. Ruff, Alexander I. Tröster, J BARTH, Sandra P. Koffler, Neil H. Pliskin, Craig W. Reynolds, C. Silver
43 views DOI Abstract
2006
Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs
C. Thomas Gualtieri, Leigh Johnson
40 views DOI Abstract
2013
Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues
Jeanne Gallo
38 views DOI Abstract
2003
Trail Making Test A and B: Normative data stratified by age and education
Tom N. Tombaugh
34 views DOI Abstract
2016
Assessment of Activities of Daily Living, Self-Care, and Independence
Michelle E. Mlinac, Michelle C. Feng
32 views DOI Abstract
2004
Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members
L Rabin, William Barr, Leslie A. Burton
32 views DOI Abstract
2026
49. Influences of Anxiety and Depression on Baseline Sway Balance and Cognitive Test Performance
P Schatz, A Wexler
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
61. Consistency in Middle School Student-Athletes’ Self-Report on Prior Health Conditions Over Time
G Atiyeh, M Reed, M Sanandaji, A M Blackstone, A M Caswell, N Cook, C McGill, S V Caswell
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
60. Psychometrics of the Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS), Self & Parent Report
C Bowman, H Johnson, G Gioia, C Vaughan
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
66. A Review of Emerging Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Uses in Sports Neuropsychology
S Panchagnula
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
14. Utilizing PAI with Veterans and First Responders with a history of mild to moderate TBI
B M M Mehmel
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
10. Unanticipated Run-to-Cut Task Increased Knee Injury Risk Mechanics in Athletes with Prior Concussion
A C Aultz, P S Ledwidge, Z L Miller, C M Chaulk, D R Grooms, M N Anderson
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
38. Executive functioning task performance is related to amount of time spent participating in open vs closed skill sports
R Brower, E Island, B Klimes- Dougan
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
21. Mental health domain scores do not differ between contact and non-contact sport Division I student-athletes
G Amadon, S M Hayes, J Houle, J T Worley
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
17. Predictors of Post-Concussion Sleep Quality in Adolescents Throughout Recovery
B Rohl, A J Zynda, A M Trbovich, C Perry, V Fazio-Sumrok, M W Collins, A E Mozel, K B Arbogast, C L Master, A P Kontos
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
34. Sport-related Concussion History, Characteristics, and Treatment among Community Adult Rugby Union Players
L C Power, I C Kenny, J J E Mulvihill, H Purtill, M W Collins, A P Kontos, T M Comyns
6 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,778 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

15.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

9.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.