Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessityNAN Policy & Planning Committee

Clicks: 2
ID: 303425
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Symptom exaggeration or fabrication occurs in a sizeable minority of neuropsychological examinees, with greater prevalence in forensic contexts. Adequate assessment of response validity is essential in order to maximize confidence in the results of neurocognitive and personality measures and in the diagnoses and recommendations that are based on the results. Symptom validity assessment may include specific tests, indices, and observations. The manner in which symptom validity is assessed may vary depending on context but must include a thorough examination of cultural factors. Assessment of response validity, as a component of a medically necessary evaluation, is medically necessary. When determined by the neuropsychologist to be necessary for the assessment of response validity, administration of specific symptom validity tests are also medically necessary.
Reference Key
openalex_W2117583832 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sarah B. Bush, Ronald M. Ruff, Alexander I. Tröster, J BARTH, Sandra P. Koffler, Neil H. Pliskin, Craig W. Reynolds, C. Silver
Journal archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the national academy of neuropsychologists
Year 2005
DOI
10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.