PsyCh journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2202 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 21 hours ago

PsyCh journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Psych J
Abbreviated Name psych j
ISSN 2046-0260
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/20460260
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (140 total)

2016
methods of estimation technogenic pollution of water bodies in urbanized territories
;Kurochkina Valentina Aleksandrovna;Telichenko Valeriy Ivanovich
, No. 6 , pp. 80-89
508 views Abstract
2019
The serotonin transporter gene variants modulate acute stress-induced hippocampus and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex activity during memory retrieval.
Li, Shijia;Tang, Jun;Gao, Yan;Thiel, Christiane M;Wolf, Oliver T;
430 views DOI Abstract
2016
residential architecture of yerevan in the 20th century. identification of the main stages in the development of the planning structure of a dwelling unit
;Azatyan Karen Rubenovich
, No. 5 , pp. 18-27
354 views Abstract
2014
point rating system as the training monitoring basis of the athletes of the national pickedwrestling team of mgsu
;Barkov Aleksandr Yur'evich
, No. 2 , pp. 225-239
322 views Abstract
2020
Comparing empowering, transformational, and transactional leadership on supervisory coaching and job performance: A multilevel perspective.
Lee, Michelle C C;Ding, Alyssa Y L;
299 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cognitive and clinical predictors of community functioning across the psychoses.
Lewandowski, Kathryn E;Cohen, Talia R;Ongur, Dost;
296 views DOI Abstract
2016
results of expert response when forming an exhaustive list of potential risks of constructions projects using energy efficient technologies
;Ryzhkova Anastasiya Igorevna
, No. 10 , pp. 141-150
296 views DOI Abstract
2012
construction of a diagram describing deformation of the concrete exposed to a single dynamic force with account of prestresses produced by the static load
;Tsvetkov Konstantin Aleksandrovich;Bazhenova Aleksandra Vladimirovna;Bezgodov Igor' Mikhaylovich
, No. 7 , pp. 152-158
289 views Abstract
2014
social, ethnical, cultural and confessional features of architectural heritage of monasteries
;Frolov Vladimir Pavlovich
, No. 6 , pp. 35-43
284 views Abstract
2020
The effect of job demands on health and work outcomes: A longitudinal study among Malaysian employees.
Muhamad Nasharudin, Nurfazreen Aina;Idris, Mohd Awang;Young, Loh M;
268 views DOI Abstract
View All 140 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.