Indexed in Journament

Clinical cardiology

ISSN 1932-8737· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.5/100
Journament Score
#6,717
Journament Rank
32
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Clin Cardiol
Abbreviated Name clin cardiol
ISSN 1932-8737
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1932-8737

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (32)

2019
Initial rivaroxaban dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation.
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Epicardial left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients via a video-assisted thoracoscopic technique: Long-term outcome.
292 views DOI Abstract
2020
Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding atrial fibrillation among neurologists in central China: A cross-sectional study.
290 views DOI Abstract
1993
New and combined sensors for adaptive-rate pacing.
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 240-8
275 views Abstract
1998
restauración de la imagen externa de la antigua casa aduana real de valencia
, No. 6 , pp. 46-61
258 views DOI Abstract
1997
la restauración arquitectónica en italia, hoy
, No. 3 , pp. 8-15
243 views DOI Abstract
1999
proyecto, conservación, innovación
, No. 8 , pp. 10-17
240 views DOI Abstract
1999
getting rid of the magic without giving up the metod. the restoration of sant pere de serrallonga.
, No. 8 , pp. 18-31
232 views DOI Abstract
1999
agenda, training, publications
, No. 7 , pp. 96-103
202 views DOI
2023
Longitudinal cardiac remodeling in collegiate American football players as assessed by echocardiography during their collegiate career.
Vol. 46 , No. 9 , pp. 1090-1096
98 views DOI Abstract
2020
Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding atrial fibrillation among neurologists in central China: A cross-sectional study.
290 views DOI Abstract
2019
Epicardial left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients via a video-assisted thoracoscopic technique: Long-term outcome.
292 views DOI Abstract
2019
Initial rivaroxaban dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation.
326 views DOI Abstract
2015
dilemas de autenticidad: la restauración de la casa freeman de frank lloyd wright
, No. 27 , pp. 56-83
102 views DOI Abstract
2015
cover
, No. 28 , pp. -
63 views DOI
2015
agenda, training, publications
, No. 28 , pp. 130-153
145 views DOI
2012
index
, No. 24-25 , pp. -
74 views DOI
2012
la restauración de la torre del homenaje del castillo de requena (valencia)
, No. 24-25 , pp. 76-83
111 views DOI Abstract
2010
text of articles in english
, No. 22-23 , pp. 154-196
59 views DOI
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.