Indexed in Journament

international journal of cardiology heart & vasculature

ISSN 2352-9067· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.7/100
Journament Score
#1,433
Journament Rank
9
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name int j cardiol heart vasc
Abbreviated Name int j cardiol heart vasc
ISSN 2352-9067
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ijc-heart-and-vasculature

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (9)

2019
A deep neural network for 12-lead electrocardiogram interpretation outperforms a conventional algorithm, and its physician overread, in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.
Vol. 25 , pp. 100423
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Native T1 time and extracellular volume fraction in differentiation of normal myocardium from non-ischemic dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy myocardium: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vol. 25 , pp. 100422
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Vol. 24 , pp. 100390
385 views DOI Abstract
2020
12-Month clinical outcomes of amphilimus drug eluting stents in an all-comers South-East Asian registry.
Vol. 26 , pp. 100469
382 views DOI Abstract
2014
faktor empiris pendorong penetrasi broadband pada tingkat ekonomi berbeda
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
368 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impairment of left atrial function and cryptogenic stroke: Potential insights in the pathophysiology of stroke in the young.
Vol. 26 , pp. 100454
366 views DOI Abstract
2014
sistem pembinaan desa informasi dalam layanan akses informasi masyarakat
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 107-123
245 views DOI Abstract
2013
kajian perilaku mahasiswa dalam menggunakan internet dengan pendekatan technology acceptance model (tam)
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 67-80
233 views DOI Abstract
2016
fenomena perkembangan tik, strukturasi, spasialisasi dan media cetak
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 139-160
194 views DOI Abstract
2020
12-Month clinical outcomes of amphilimus drug eluting stents in an all-comers South-East Asian registry.
Vol. 26 , pp. 100469
382 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impairment of left atrial function and cryptogenic stroke: Potential insights in the pathophysiology of stroke in the young.
Vol. 26 , pp. 100454
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Native T1 time and extracellular volume fraction in differentiation of normal myocardium from non-ischemic dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy myocardium: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vol. 25 , pp. 100422
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
A deep neural network for 12-lead electrocardiogram interpretation outperforms a conventional algorithm, and its physician overread, in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.
Vol. 25 , pp. 100423
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Vol. 24 , pp. 100390
385 views DOI Abstract
2016
fenomena perkembangan tik, strukturasi, spasialisasi dan media cetak
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 139-160
194 views DOI Abstract
2014
sistem pembinaan desa informasi dalam layanan akses informasi masyarakat
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 107-123
245 views DOI Abstract
2014
faktor empiris pendorong penetrasi broadband pada tingkat ekonomi berbeda
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
368 views DOI Abstract
2013
kajian perilaku mahasiswa dalam menggunakan internet dengan pendekatan technology acceptance model (tam)
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 67-80
233 views DOI Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.