Indexed in Journament

international journal of cardiology heart & vasculature

ISSN 2352-9067· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,858 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
9 Articles
Scores higher than 45.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name int j cardiol heart vasc
Abbreviated Name int j cardiol heart vasc
ISSN 2352-9067
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ijc-heart-and-vasculature

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 5.0 5.8
Content Distribution 83.4 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (9)

2019
Native T1 time and extracellular volume fraction in differentiation of normal myocardium from non-ischemic dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy myocardium: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Minegishi, Shintaro;Kato, Shingo;Takase-Minegishi, Kaoru;Horita, Nobuyuki;Azushima, Kengo;Wakui, Hiromichi;Ishigami, Tomoaki;Kosuge, Masami;Kimura, Kazuo;Tamura, Kouichi;
Vol. 25 , pp. 100422
444 views DOI Abstract
2019
A deep neural network for 12-lead electrocardiogram interpretation outperforms a conventional algorithm, and its physician overread, in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.
Smith, Stephen W;Rapin, Jeremy;Li, Jia;Fleureau, Yann;Fennell, William;Walsh, Brooks M;Rosier, Arnaud;Fiorina, Laurent;Gardella, Christophe;
Vol. 25 , pp. 100423
440 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Kaya, Elif;Siebermair, Johannes;Azizy, Obayda;Dobrev, Dobromir;Rassaf, Tienush;Wakili, Reza;
Vol. 24 , pp. 100390
422 views DOI Abstract
2020
12-Month clinical outcomes of amphilimus drug eluting stents in an all-comers South-East Asian registry.
Ho, Hee Hwa;Sinaga, Dasdo Antonius;Arshad, Mohd Kamal Mohd;Kasim, Sazzli;Lee, Jin Hyun;Khoo, Deanna Zhi Lin;Loh, Kwok Kong;Jafary, Fahim Haider;Ong, Paul Jau Lueng;Lo, Simon Soo Siong;
Vol. 26 , pp. 100469
420 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impairment of left atrial function and cryptogenic stroke: Potential insights in the pathophysiology of stroke in the young.
Bhat, Aditya;Khanna, Shaun;Chen, Henry H;Lee, Lina;Gan, Gary C H;Negishi, Kazuaki;MacIntyre, C Raina;Nunes, Maria Carmo P;Tan, Timothy C;
Vol. 26 , pp. 100454
397 views DOI Abstract
2014
faktor empiris pendorong penetrasi broadband pada tingkat ekonomi berbeda
;Inasari Widyastuti
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
392 views DOI Abstract
2014
sistem pembinaan desa informasi dalam layanan akses informasi masyarakat
;Heru Pudjo Buntoro;Atjih Ratnawati
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 107-123
265 views DOI Abstract
2013
kajian perilaku mahasiswa dalam menggunakan internet dengan pendekatan technology acceptance model (tam)
;Khairul Amri;Jen Surya
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 67-80
261 views DOI Abstract
2016
fenomena perkembangan tik, strukturasi, spasialisasi dan media cetak
;Hasyim Ali Imran
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 139-160
215 views DOI Abstract
2020
12-Month clinical outcomes of amphilimus drug eluting stents in an all-comers South-East Asian registry.
Ho, Hee Hwa;Sinaga, Dasdo Antonius;Arshad, Mohd Kamal Mohd;Kasim, Sazzli;Lee, Jin Hyun;Khoo, Deanna Zhi Lin;Loh, Kwok Kong;Jafary, Fahim Haider;Ong, Paul Jau Lueng;Lo, Simon Soo Siong;
Vol. 26 , pp. 100469
420 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impairment of left atrial function and cryptogenic stroke: Potential insights in the pathophysiology of stroke in the young.
Bhat, Aditya;Khanna, Shaun;Chen, Henry H;Lee, Lina;Gan, Gary C H;Negishi, Kazuaki;MacIntyre, C Raina;Nunes, Maria Carmo P;Tan, Timothy C;
Vol. 26 , pp. 100454
397 views DOI Abstract
2019
Native T1 time and extracellular volume fraction in differentiation of normal myocardium from non-ischemic dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy myocardium: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Minegishi, Shintaro;Kato, Shingo;Takase-Minegishi, Kaoru;Horita, Nobuyuki;Azushima, Kengo;Wakui, Hiromichi;Ishigami, Tomoaki;Kosuge, Masami;Kimura, Kazuo;Tamura, Kouichi;
Vol. 25 , pp. 100422
444 views DOI Abstract
2019
A deep neural network for 12-lead electrocardiogram interpretation outperforms a conventional algorithm, and its physician overread, in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.
Smith, Stephen W;Rapin, Jeremy;Li, Jia;Fleureau, Yann;Fennell, William;Walsh, Brooks M;Rosier, Arnaud;Fiorina, Laurent;Gardella, Christophe;
Vol. 25 , pp. 100423
440 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Kaya, Elif;Siebermair, Johannes;Azizy, Obayda;Dobrev, Dobromir;Rassaf, Tienush;Wakili, Reza;
Vol. 24 , pp. 100390
422 views DOI Abstract
2016
fenomena perkembangan tik, strukturasi, spasialisasi dan media cetak
;Hasyim Ali Imran
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 139-160
215 views DOI Abstract
2014
sistem pembinaan desa informasi dalam layanan akses informasi masyarakat
;Heru Pudjo Buntoro;Atjih Ratnawati
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 107-123
265 views DOI Abstract
2014
faktor empiris pendorong penetrasi broadband pada tingkat ekonomi berbeda
;Inasari Widyastuti
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
392 views DOI Abstract
2013
kajian perilaku mahasiswa dalam menggunakan internet dengan pendekatan technology acceptance model (tam)
;Khairul Amri;Jen Surya
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 67-80
261 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,858 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

83.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.