international journal of cardiology heart & vasculature | Journament

Journal Ranking

#286 / 33,955
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

international journal of cardiology heart & vasculature

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name int j cardiol heart vasc
Abbreviated Name int j cardiol heart vasc
ISSN 2352-9067
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ijc-heart-and-vasculature
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

2019
A deep neural network for 12-lead electrocardiogram interpretation outperforms a conventional algorithm, and its physician overread, in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.
Smith, Stephen W;Rapin, Jeremy;Li, Jia;Fleureau, Yann;Fennell, William;Walsh, Brooks M;Rosier, Arnaud;Fiorina, Laurent;Gardella, Christophe;
Vol. 25 , pp. 100423
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Native T1 time and extracellular volume fraction in differentiation of normal myocardium from non-ischemic dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy myocardium: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Minegishi, Shintaro;Kato, Shingo;Takase-Minegishi, Kaoru;Horita, Nobuyuki;Azushima, Kengo;Wakui, Hiromichi;Ishigami, Tomoaki;Kosuge, Masami;Kimura, Kazuo;Tamura, Kouichi;
Vol. 25 , pp. 100422
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in patients undergoing implantation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
Kaya, Elif;Siebermair, Johannes;Azizy, Obayda;Dobrev, Dobromir;Rassaf, Tienush;Wakili, Reza;
Vol. 24 , pp. 100390
359 views DOI Abstract
2020
12-Month clinical outcomes of amphilimus drug eluting stents in an all-comers South-East Asian registry.
Ho, Hee Hwa;Sinaga, Dasdo Antonius;Arshad, Mohd Kamal Mohd;Kasim, Sazzli;Lee, Jin Hyun;Khoo, Deanna Zhi Lin;Loh, Kwok Kong;Jafary, Fahim Haider;Ong, Paul Jau Lueng;Lo, Simon Soo Siong;
Vol. 26 , pp. 100469
356 views DOI Abstract
2014
faktor empiris pendorong penetrasi broadband pada tingkat ekonomi berbeda
;Inasari Widyastuti
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
343 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impairment of left atrial function and cryptogenic stroke: Potential insights in the pathophysiology of stroke in the young.
Bhat, Aditya;Khanna, Shaun;Chen, Henry H;Lee, Lina;Gan, Gary C H;Negishi, Kazuaki;MacIntyre, C Raina;Nunes, Maria Carmo P;Tan, Timothy C;
Vol. 26 , pp. 100454
340 views DOI Abstract
2014
sistem pembinaan desa informasi dalam layanan akses informasi masyarakat
;Heru Pudjo Buntoro;Atjih Ratnawati
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 107-123
221 views DOI Abstract
2013
kajian perilaku mahasiswa dalam menggunakan internet dengan pendekatan technology acceptance model (tam)
;Khairul Amri;Jen Surya
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 67-80
213 views DOI Abstract
2016
fenomena perkembangan tik, strukturasi, spasialisasi dan media cetak
;Hasyim Ali Imran
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 139-160
171 views DOI Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.