Journal of medicine and life | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4283 / 33,957
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Journal of medicine and life

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name J Med Life
Abbreviated Name j med life
ISSN 1844-3117
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (60 total)

diversity in the environments of nosocomial infection cases at a university hospital.
Diba, Kambiz;Jangi, Farzaneh;Makhdoomi, Khadijeh;Moshiri, Naser;Mansouri, Fatemeh;
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 128-132
323 views DOI Abstract
2006
la metáfora como proceso cognitivo
;Luz Amparo Fajardo Uribe
, No. 19 , pp. 47-56
258 views Abstract
2008
estrategias de persuasión en un discurso publicitario: una mirada complementaria
;Julia Marlén Baquero Velásquez
, No. 21 , pp. 35-58
242 views Abstract
1998
una guía general para el estudio etnográfico del habla
;Sherzer Joel;Darnell Regna;Silva Vargas Sandra Patricia
, No. 11 , pp. 135-148
233 views Abstract
2000
estrategias de cortesía: análisis intercultural
;Haverkate Henk
, No. 13 , pp. 16-30
228 views Abstract
2008
atitudes em fronteira: o caso de tabatinga e letícia border attitudes: the case of tabatinga and leticia border attitudes: the case of tabatinga and leticia
;Gabriela de Campos Barbosa
, No. 21 , pp. 303-324
226 views Abstract
2010
desarrollo de habilidades en el español escrito en personas sordas universitaras: estudio de caso
;Rita Flórez Romero;Silvia Baquero Castellanos;Liz Alejandra Sánchez Navas
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 33-71
220 views Abstract
2018
Health marketing and behavioral change: a review of the literature
Chichirez, C.
Vol. 11 , pp. 15-19
210 views
2009
pronombres de forma: el uso anafÓrico de marcas de clase en miraÑa
;Frank Seifart
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 67-94
194 views Abstract
Making Things Easier: A Simple Novel Method to Fix a Dorsiflexion Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal.
Kurar, Langhit;Nash, William;Faroug, Radwane;Hussain, Laila;Walker, Roland;Abbasian, Ali;Latif, Ahmed;Singh, Samrendu;
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 160-163
191 views DOI Abstract
View All 60 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.