Indexed in Journament

Journal of medicine and life

ISSN 1844-3117· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,577 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
60 Articles
Scores higher than 12.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Med Life
Abbreviated Name j med life
ISSN 1844-3117

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 45.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of medicine and life
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 8.6 7.8
Content Distribution 45.7 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (60)

diversity in the environments of nosocomial infection cases at a university hospital.
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 128-132
354 views DOI Abstract
2006
la metáfora como proceso cognitivo
, No. 19 , pp. 47-56
305 views Abstract
2008
estrategias de persuasión en un discurso publicitario: una mirada complementaria
, No. 21 , pp. 35-58
297 views Abstract
2000
estrategias de cortesía: análisis intercultural
, No. 13 , pp. 16-30
281 views Abstract
2010
desarrollo de habilidades en el español escrito en personas sordas universitaras: estudio de caso
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 33-71
279 views Abstract
1998
una guía general para el estudio etnográfico del habla
, No. 11 , pp. 135-148
268 views Abstract
2018
Making Things Easier: A Simple Novel Method to Fix a Dorsiflexion Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal.
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 160-163
234 views DOI Abstract
2009
pronombres de forma: el uso anafÓrico de marcas de clase en miraÑa
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 67-94
227 views Abstract
2018
2017
alli kilkay, apuntes crÍticos acerca de la ortografÍa del inga
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 165-187
38 views Abstract
2017
el anÁlisis del forzamiento de los cumplidos
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 77-94
39 views Abstract
2016
hacia una representaciÓn fonÉtica de las seÑas: secuencialidad y contraste
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 247-279
26 views
2015
2015
euphemistic and dysphemistic language in fifty shades of grey trilogy
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 117-135
144 views Abstract
2014
la entonación de enunciados interrogativos transaccionales en el español hablado en colombia
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 207-246
133 views Abstract
2013
acercamiento teÓrico a la comprensiÓn-interpretaciÓn del lenguaje figurado en aprendices tardÍos de l2
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 165-181
152 views Abstract
Journament Score
27.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,577 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

27.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

45.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.