Indexed in Journament

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care

ISSN 1464-3677· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.3 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,211 of 29,297 scored journals (34,027 indexed)
151 Articles
Scores higher than 95.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Int J Qual Health Care
Abbreviated Name int j qual health care
ISSN 1464-3677
URL http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.0
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 44.4 25.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 5.8
Content Distribution 20.2 89.5
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (151)

2017
shortage of psychotropic medications in community pharmacies in saudi arabia: causes and solutions
;Yazed Sulaiman Al-Ruthia;Wael Mansy;Mohammad Barasin;Yazeed Mohammad Ghawaa;Mohammed AlSultan;Mohammad A. Alsenaidy;Solaiman Alhawas;Sultan AlGhadeer
Vol. 25 , No. 5 , pp. 744-749
550 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of TeamSTEPPS on patient safety culture in a Swiss maternity ward.
Staines, Anthony;Lécureux, Estelle;Rubin, Pascal;Baralon, Christian;Farin, Alexandre;
505 views DOI Abstract
2018
Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation.
Verkerk, Eva W;Tanke, Marit A C;Kool, Rudolf B;van Dulmen, Simone A;Westert, Gert P;
Vol. 30 , No. 9 , pp. 736-739
502 views DOI Abstract
2016
pathogen distribution and drug resistance of nephrology patients with urinary tract infections
;Yunqian Wang;Huicong Li;Baoping Chen
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. 337-340
491 views DOI Abstract
2017
knowledge of community pharmacists about the risks of medication use during pregnancy in central region of saudi arabia
;Ziyad Alrabiah;Mohamed N. Al-Arifi;Sultan M. Alghadeer;Syed Wajid;Ali AlQahtani;Naif Almotari;AbdAllh AlHwerani;Salmeen D. Babelghaith
Vol. 25 , No. 7 , pp. 1093-1096
482 views DOI Abstract
2017
polymeric films as a promising carrier for bioadhesive drug delivery: development, characterization and optimization
;Pallavi Bassi;Gurpreet Kaur
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 32-43
479 views DOI Abstract
2017
Determinants of patient loyalty to healthcare providers: An integrative review.
Zhou, Wei-Jiao;Wan, Qiao-Qin;Liu, Cong-Ying;Feng, Xiao-Lin;Shang, Shao-Mei;
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 442-449
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quality control circle: a tool for enhancing perceptions of patient safety culture among hospital staff in Chinese hospitals.
Zhang, Dan;Liao, Meixia;Zhou, Yiping;Liu, Tingfang;
413 views DOI Abstract
2018
Development of a framework to describe patient and family harm from disrespect and promote improvements in quality and safety: a scoping review.
Sokol-Hessner, Lauge;Kane, Gregory J;Annas, Catherine L;Coletti, Margaret;Sarnoff Lee, Barbara;Thomas, Eric J;Bell, Sigall;Folcarelli, Patricia;
411 views DOI Abstract
2016
Building bridges: engaging medical residents in quality improvement and medical leadership.
Voogt, Judith J;van Rensen, Elizabeth L J;van der Schaaf, Marieke F;Noordegraaf, Mirko;Schneider, Margriet Me;
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 665-674
390 views DOI Abstract
2026
Challenges and opportunities with adapting international health care quality indicators to local contexts: A descriptive case study
Isabelle Vedel, Deniz Cetin‐Sahin, Geneviève Arsenault‐Lapierre, Clara Bolster‐Foucault, Marwa Ilali, Amélie Quesnel‐Vallée
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Understanding Workplace Violence in Healthcare: Insights from an Eight-Year Case Study in a Swiss Hospital Network
Angela Greco
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
When Teamwork Is Not Enough: How Organizational Learning and Continuous Improvement Strengthen the Teamwork–Handoff Relationship in Hospitals
Seung-Hwan Kim
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Healthcare Workflow Interventions to Reduce Delays in Urological Care: A Systematic Review
Rafaela Mendonça, Marcello Perez Marques de Azevedo, Maria Cláudia Bicudo, João Paulo Zambon
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Waiting for elective orthopaedic surgery: A qualitative scoping review of the patient experience
Elizabeth Walkley, Katheryn Hall, Dannielle Hopkinson, Mina Nichols‐Boyd, Elise Williams, Nicole Pope
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Preparing HSCT and CAR‑T Therapy Programmes for JACIE Inspection: A Structured Methodological Approach to Implementing a Quality Management System
Dimitrios Bourantas, Carlos Panizo
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Quality Frameworks in Intensive Care Units: A Scoping Review of Accreditation, Certification, and Standards-Based Pathways to Safer Care
Javier Muñoz, José Antonio Peral-Gutiérrez de Ceballos, Raquel Ribón-Liberal, Elena Moreno-Ortega, Lourdes Carmen Visedo
16 views DOI Abstract
2026
Report Quality Is Not Investigation Quality: Strengthening Patient Safety Learning
Lis Parida, Sudarwan Danim, Rendy Wikrama Wardana, Fitri April Yanti, Rikas Saputra
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
Patient Safety Culture in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Evidence Involving Hospital Pharmacists
Ezinwanne Jane Ugochukwu, Olanrewaju Faith Omotayo, Onyinye Blessing Ukoha-Kalu, Isaac Ibezim, Isah Abdulmuminu, Nneka Uchenna Igboeli, Chukwuemeka Michael Ubaka
20 views DOI Abstract
2026
The I’-chart: a preliminary investigation of an improved individuals chart for quality improvement and control
Jacob Anhøj, Wayne A. Taylor, Mohammed Amin Mohammed
21 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
42.3/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,211 of 29,297 scored
(34,027 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

44.4/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

20.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.