Indexed in Journament

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care

ISSN 1464-3677· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
44.6/100
Journament Score
#256
Journament Rank
99
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Int J Qual Health Care
Abbreviated Name int j qual health care
ISSN 1464-3677
URL http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (99)

2017
shortage of psychotropic medications in community pharmacies in saudi arabia: causes and solutions
Vol. 25 , No. 5 , pp. 744-749
481 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of TeamSTEPPS on patient safety culture in a Swiss maternity ward.
467 views DOI Abstract
2018
Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation.
Vol. 30 , No. 9 , pp. 736-739
461 views DOI Abstract
2016
pathogen distribution and drug resistance of nephrology patients with urinary tract infections
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. 337-340
459 views DOI Abstract
2017
knowledge of community pharmacists about the risks of medication use during pregnancy in central region of saudi arabia
Vol. 25 , No. 7 , pp. 1093-1096
447 views DOI Abstract
2017
polymeric films as a promising carrier for bioadhesive drug delivery: development, characterization and optimization
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 32-43
426 views DOI Abstract
2017
Determinants of patient loyalty to healthcare providers: An integrative review.
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 442-449
362 views DOI Abstract
2018
Development of a framework to describe patient and family harm from disrespect and promote improvements in quality and safety: a scoping review.
358 views DOI Abstract
2016
Building bridges: engaging medical residents in quality improvement and medical leadership.
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 665-674
345 views DOI Abstract
2026
Improving surgical patients’ safety in African hospitals: exploring healthcare professionals’ experiences of Phase 1 of the “5Rs to Rescue” programme
DOI Abstract
2026
Measuring Safer Opioid Use in Hospitals: Development of Consensus-Based Safety and Quality Indicators - a modified Delphi study
DOI Abstract
2026
Illness Does Not Stop Childhood: Rethinking Play as a Dimension of Quality in Paediatric Healthcare
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Advancing learning healthcare systems with best practice meetings: a mixed-methods study with insights from the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Glucometer Versus Standard Enzymatic Method for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review for Diagnostic Test Accuracy
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Continuity of care: listening to patients’ judgements on the quality of care
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Medical Waste Management within the Green Hospital Approach: A Systematic Review of Direct, Contextual, and Transferable Evidence
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Assessing the Real-World Value of Hemophilia Care: How Suitable Are Patient-Centered Outcomes for Hospital-Level Comparisons?
4 views DOI Abstract
45
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
85
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

44.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

85.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.