Indexed in Journament

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care

ISSN 1464-3677· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,996 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
114 Articles
Scores higher than 79.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Int J Qual Health Care
Abbreviated Name int j qual health care
ISSN 1464-3677
URL http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 100.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 11.4 7.8
Content Distribution 28.2 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (114)

2017
shortage of psychotropic medications in community pharmacies in saudi arabia: causes and solutions
;Yazed Sulaiman Al-Ruthia;Wael Mansy;Mohammad Barasin;Yazeed Mohammad Ghawaa;Mohammed AlSultan;Mohammad A. Alsenaidy;Solaiman Alhawas;Sultan AlGhadeer
Vol. 25 , No. 5 , pp. 744-749
500 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of TeamSTEPPS on patient safety culture in a Swiss maternity ward.
Staines, Anthony;Lécureux, Estelle;Rubin, Pascal;Baralon, Christian;Farin, Alexandre;
477 views DOI Abstract
2018
Limit, lean or listen? A typology of low-value care that gives direction in de-implementation.
Verkerk, Eva W;Tanke, Marit A C;Kool, Rudolf B;van Dulmen, Simone A;Westert, Gert P;
Vol. 30 , No. 9 , pp. 736-739
470 views DOI Abstract
2016
pathogen distribution and drug resistance of nephrology patients with urinary tract infections
;Yunqian Wang;Huicong Li;Baoping Chen
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. 337-340
468 views DOI Abstract
2017
knowledge of community pharmacists about the risks of medication use during pregnancy in central region of saudi arabia
;Ziyad Alrabiah;Mohamed N. Al-Arifi;Sultan M. Alghadeer;Syed Wajid;Ali AlQahtani;Naif Almotari;AbdAllh AlHwerani;Salmeen D. Babelghaith
Vol. 25 , No. 7 , pp. 1093-1096
459 views DOI Abstract
2017
polymeric films as a promising carrier for bioadhesive drug delivery: development, characterization and optimization
;Pallavi Bassi;Gurpreet Kaur
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 32-43
436 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quality control circle: a tool for enhancing perceptions of patient safety culture among hospital staff in Chinese hospitals.
Zhang, Dan;Liao, Meixia;Zhou, Yiping;Liu, Tingfang;
387 views DOI Abstract
2017
Determinants of patient loyalty to healthcare providers: An integrative review.
Zhou, Wei-Jiao;Wan, Qiao-Qin;Liu, Cong-Ying;Feng, Xiao-Lin;Shang, Shao-Mei;
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 442-449
373 views DOI Abstract
2018
Development of a framework to describe patient and family harm from disrespect and promote improvements in quality and safety: a scoping review.
Sokol-Hessner, Lauge;Kane, Gregory J;Annas, Catherine L;Coletti, Margaret;Sarnoff Lee, Barbara;Thomas, Eric J;Bell, Sigall;Folcarelli, Patricia;
371 views DOI Abstract
2016
Building bridges: engaging medical residents in quality improvement and medical leadership.
Voogt, Judith J;van Rensen, Elizabeth L J;van der Schaaf, Marieke F;Noordegraaf, Mirko;Schneider, Margriet Me;
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 665-674
347 views DOI Abstract
2026
Working hours, physician health, and quality of care: Lessons from young doctors’ deaths in Indonesia
Muhammad Ali Adriansyah, Diana, Winastanto Wibowo, Aryanti Situmorang, Raup Padillah
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Frailty, depression, and quality of life in acute care for elderly: a serial mediation and moderated mediation study in Taiwan
Chau-Nee Chen, Tzu-Jung Fang, Cheng‐Fang Hsieh, Chun-Chang Chen, Yu-Fu Chen, Hong-Yaw Chen, Pin-Yu Lai, Yu-Han Lu, Hon-Yi Shi
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Satisfaction with clinical practice environments among early-career health professionals in South Africa: Findings from the WiSDOM cohort study
Laetitia C. Rispel, Prudence Ditlopo, Duane Blaauw
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
From Reactive Compliance to Systemic Value: A Paradigm Shift in Global Patient Safety
Tong Liu, Ji Luo, Feng Xiao, Jinmei Jiang, Jun Wang, Qinghua Zhao, Mingzhao Xiao
10 views DOI
2026
Development and validation of a machine learning–based model for predicting fall-related injury risk in hospitalized patients
Shiyu Wang, Xiaomei Zhang, Yi Qin, Xiuqun Xu, Linjing Du, Panpan Xu, Jiahui Yu, Yanqing Li, Lingyan Yang
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Observed quality of intrapartum care in Dire Dawa Administration, eastern Ethiopia
Moti Tolera Jalu, Dessie Yadeta, Tsinuel Girma, Margaret E Kruk, Bereket Yakob
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Cultural determinants and strategic priorities for medication safety in acute care: a multidisciplinary Delphi study
Neville Schembri, Hannah-Kim Grima Formosa, Kevin Holmes, Marie Clare Cassar, Shane Desselle, Timothy F Chen, Maria Cordina, Lorna Bonnici West
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Medication reconciliation documentation and documented discrepancies in a tertiary Saudi hospital: a retrospective observational study
Ashwaq H. Alharthi, Marwan Alrasheed, Yahya M. K. Tawfik, Sara Z Almutairi, Aliyah Y Almobarak, Yousif A. Asiri
16 views DOI Abstract
2026
Lessons learned from nationwide perinatal audit of severe postpartum haemorrhage in the Netherlands
Lisa Broeders, Steven V. Koenen, Nicole de Vocht, Thomas van den Akker, Ageeth N. Rosman
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices around Cervical Cancer Screening in the Gulu District of Northern Uganda: A cross-sectional study
Tana Chongsuwat, André Nana, Aaliyah O. Ibrahim, Ann E Evensen, James H. Conway, Sumba O Pius, Ibrahim Sseddangira, Usman Iqbal, William Oloya
26 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,996 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

28.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.