Indexed in Journament

Biology

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
50.3 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #53 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
35 Articles
Scores higher than 99.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nom Abrégé Biology (Basel)
Nom Abrégé biology
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 60.0
Diversity 55.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 71.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Biology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.2
Accessibility 17.8
Timeliness 60.0 15.9
Diversity 55.6 28.3
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 10.7 11.5
Content Distribution 71.8 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (35)

2019
Advances in Omics Approaches for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Tomato.
Vol. 8 , No. 4
548 views DOI Abstract
2015
Monoacylated Cellular Prion Proteins Reduce Amyloid-β-Induced Activation of Cytoplasmic Phospholipase A2 and Synapse Damage
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 367-382
455 views Abstract
2012
Vulnerability to climate change of mangroves: assessment from cameroon, central Africa.
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 617-38
446 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
from Red Mushroom Attenuates Formaldehyde-Induced Liver Damage in Experimental Male Rat Model.
Vol. 9 , No. 10
422 views DOI Abstract
2012
Vulnerability to Climate Change of Mangroves: Assessment from Cameroon, Central Africa
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 617-638
414 views Abstract
2016
2017
phenological cycle and physicochemical characteristics of avocado cultivars in subtropical conditions
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 517-528
395 views DOI Abstract
2017
assessment of offshore wind power potential in the aegean and ionian seas based on high-resolution hindcast model results
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 268-289
373 views DOI Abstract
2025
The Extremophiles: Adaptation Mechanisms and Biotechnological Applications.
Vol. 14
57 views DOI Abstract
2023
Effects of Climate Change on Chlorophyll in the Barents Sea: A Long-Term Assessment.
Vol. 12 , No. 1
154 views DOI Abstract
2022
Nitrogen and Carbon Mineralization from Green and Senesced Leaf Litter Differ between Cycad and Angiosperm Trees
Vol. 11 , No. 12 , pp. 1758-
50 views DOI Abstract
2020
Calligonum polygonoides L. Shrubs Provide Species-Specific Facilitation for the Understory Plants in Coastal Ecosystem
Vol. 9 , No. 8 , pp. -
227 views Abstract
2020
from Red Mushroom Attenuates Formaldehyde-Induced Liver Damage in Experimental Male Rat Model.
Vol. 9 , No. 10
422 views DOI Abstract
2020
Temperature Decreases Spread Parameters of the New Covid-19 Case Dynamics.
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 0-0
201 views DOI Abstract
2020
Journament Score
50.3/100 · Average
Ranked #53 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

50.3/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.