Indexed in Journament

journal of analytical toxicology

ISSN 1945-2403· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,561 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
61 Articles
Scores higher than 87.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j anal toxicol
Abbreviated Name journal of analytical toxicology
ISSN 1945-2403

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 100.0
Diversity 50.0
Innovation 21.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 19.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of analytical toxicology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 50.0 26.3
Innovation 21.0 24.1
Community Impact 3.6 4.3
Content Distribution 19.7 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (61)

2017
A Fast and Comprehensive Analysis of 32 Synthetic Cannabinoids Using Agilent Triple Quadrupole LC-MS-MS.
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 6-16
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
2019
The Opioid Epidemic: Moving Toward an Integrated, Holistic Analytical Response.
Vol. 43 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
337 views DOI Abstract
2026
A retrospective review of phencyclidine in hair samples of subjects from the United States workplace drug testing population
43 views DOI Abstract
2026
Trends in synthetic cathinone detection in seized drug samples submitted to the U.S. DEA's National Forensic Laboratory System, 2010–2024
42 views DOI Abstract
2026
Blood pharmacokinetics and use of metabolite-to-parent ratios to predict time of last Zopiclone intake
38 views DOI Abstract
2026
Thinking beyond blood: Brain concentrations and brain-blood ratios in postmortem toxicology
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
2026
Impact of buccal cell content and swab retention on tetrahydrocannabinol and cocaine concentrations in oral fluid
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
Urinary detection and metabolites profiles of trenbolone and metenolone following trace-level dermal exposure
15 views DOI Abstract
2026
Xylazine: Evaluation of antemortem and postmortem specimen storage conditions
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring-Guided Management of Venlafaxine Overdose in an Adolescent: a case report
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Strengthening global NPS surveillance: The role of UNODC Early Warning Advisory data
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
Intoxications and Fatalities Associated with the Ingestion of the Novel Synthetic Cathinone, N-Isopropyl Butylone
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Validation of the Neogen® ELISA Gabapentin Kit for Blood and Urine
17 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,561 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

50.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

21.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

19.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.