Indexed in Journament

journal of analytical toxicology

ISSN 1945-2403· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,352 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
49 Articles
Scores higher than 51% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j anal toxicol
Abbreviated Name journal of analytical toxicology
ISSN 1945-2403

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of analytical toxicology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility 15.0 17.9
Timeliness 90.0 19.2
Diversity 30.0 28.8
Innovation 40.0 31.2
Community Impact 34.0 13.4
Content Distribution 14.6 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (49)

2017
A Fast and Comprehensive Analysis of 32 Synthetic Cannabinoids Using Agilent Triple Quadrupole LC-MS-MS.
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 6-16
377 views DOI Abstract
2020
2019
The Opioid Epidemic: Moving Toward an Integrated, Holistic Analytical Response.
Vol. 43 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
310 views DOI Abstract
2026
A retrospective review of phencyclidine in hair samples of subjects from the United States workplace drug testing population
25 views DOI Abstract
2026
Blood pharmacokinetics and use of metabolite-to-parent ratios to predict time of last Zopiclone intake
23 views DOI Abstract
2026
Studies on Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Psilocin- <i>O</i> -glucuronide for Screening of Psilocin in Human Urine by Liquid Chromatography-Triple Quadrupole Tandem Mass Spectrometry
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
A five-year longitudinal evaluation of the behavioral and toxicological factors defining the trauma-toxicity continuum in methamphetamine fatalities
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Trends in synthetic cathinone detection in seized drug samples submitted to the U.S. DEA's National Forensic Laboratory System, 2010–2024
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
Complementary insights from wastewater surveillance and the toxicology findings of clinical presentations involving new psychoactive substances in Australia
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Toxicokinetics and Tissue Distribution of Carbofuran and Its Six Metabolites in Rats
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Tramadol in drug-facilitated sexual assault: Global case prevalence, pharmacology and drug interactions
18 views DOI Abstract
2026
From Blood to Brain: Postmortem Brain Concentrations and Brain-Blood Ratios of Chlorprothixene, Clozapine, Olanzapine and Quetiapine
13 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,352 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

14.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.