Comment on Chang et al.: defining the added interpretive value of brain fentanyl testing at low blood concentrations

Clicks: 16
ID: 332049
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #47 of 64 articles by views in journal of analytical toxicology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Chang et al. report substantial variability in fentanyl blood-to-brain relationships and suggest that brain testing may be beneficial in suspected overdose cases with low peripheral blood concentrations. We suggest that this implication would be strengthened by distinguishing analytical confirmation from incremental forensic interpretation. Demonstrating fentanyl in a second matrix does not itself establish that the brain result changes attribution of fentanyl's role in death. A focused analysis of low-blood cases in which brain findings altered interpretation, supported by scene, autopsy, and co-intoxicant data, would better define the practical value of brain testing.
Reference Key
openalex_W7221346667 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ercan Yılmaz, Zeynep Yamancan Yılmaz
Journal journal of analytical toxicology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jat/bkag088
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.