Turkish journal of medical sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1397 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

Turkish journal of medical sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Turk J Med Sci
Abbreviated Name turk j med sci
ISSN 1300-0144
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/journals/medical
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

2018
Effect of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition on joint and muscle damage in rats with adjuvant arthritis
Bahadır, Faize Elif;Köroğlu, Mustafa Kutay;Yüksel, Meral;Ercan, Feriha;Alican, Y. İnci;
Vol. 48 , No. 3 , pp. 635-643
434 views DOI Abstract
2018
Ankaferd Blood Stopper with antibiofilm potential successfully inhibits the extracellular matrix degradation enzymes and promotes wound healing of 3T3 fibroblasts in vitro
Boran, Rukiye;Baygar, Tuba;Saraç, Nurdan;Uğur, Aysel;
Vol. 48 , No. 3 , pp. 627-634
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
Initial Regional Evaluation of Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Program: Data from Mediterranean Coast of Turkey.
Başaran, Abdurrahman Erdem;Başaran, Ayşen;Kocacik, Dilara Fatma;Alper, Özgül;Acican, Deniz;Bingöl, Ayşen;
370 views DOI Abstract
2016
Long-term assessment of coronary care unit patient profile and outcomes: analyses of the 12-years patient records.
Doğan, Selami;Dursun, Hüseyin;Can, Hüseyin;Ellidokuz, Hülya;Kaya, Dayimi;
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 801-6
353 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19, immune system response, hyperinflammation and repurposing anti-rheumatic drugs.
Tufan, Abdurrahman;Avanoğlu Güler, Aslihan;Matucci-Cerinic, Marco;
318 views DOI Abstract
2019
Audiometric threshold shifts after total knee arthroplasty by using gentamicin-loaded bone cement
Çöbden, Adem;Çamurcu, Yalkın;Bulut Çöbden, Serap;Sofu, Hakan;Üçpunar, Hanifi;Sevencan, Ahmet;Demirel, Hüseyin;
Vol. 49 , No. 2 , pp. 514-518
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Serum endocan level and diastolic functions in the case of lead exposure
Kara, Halil;Karakulak, Uğur Nadir;Gündüzöz, Meside;Bal, Ceylan;Alışık, Murat;Büyükşekerci, Murat;İritaş, Servet Bilgin;Yılmaz, Ömer Hınç;Tutkun, Lütfiye;
Vol. 49 , No. 1 , pp. 66-73
274 views DOI Abstract
2014
the pomeranian music as a narrative of cultural memory
;Danilo Kuhn da Silva
Vol. 11 , No. 21 , pp. -
269 views Abstract
2014
the racial question on the formation of brazilian social thinking – law 10639/03 – social services and the academy
;Nino Rafael Medeiros Kruger;Carla Silva de Avila;Myrian Siqueira da Cunha
Vol. 11 , No. 22 , pp. -
269 views Abstract
2012
pelotas,“cidade de gays”: um estudo sobre os usos políticos de uma representação
;Gláucia Cavalheiro
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. -
229 views Abstract
View All 33 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.