Indexed in Journament

Turkish journal of medical sciences

ISSN 1300-0144· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,266 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
33 Articles
Scores higher than 13.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Turk J Med Sci
Abbreviated Name turk j med sci
ISSN 1300-0144
URL http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/journals/medical

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Turkish journal of medical sciences
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 7.9 5.8
Content Distribution 53.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (33)

2018
Effect of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition on joint and muscle damage in rats with adjuvant arthritis
Vol. 48 , No. 3 , pp. 635-643
484 views DOI Abstract
2019
Initial Regional Evaluation of Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Program: Data from Mediterranean Coast of Turkey.
419 views DOI Abstract
2016
Long-term assessment of coronary care unit patient profile and outcomes: analyses of the 12-years patient records.
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 801-6
403 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19, immune system response, hyperinflammation and repurposing anti-rheumatic drugs.
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Audiometric threshold shifts after total knee arthroplasty by using gentamicin-loaded bone cement
Vol. 49 , No. 2 , pp. 514-518
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Serum endocan level and diastolic functions in the case of lead exposure
Vol. 49 , No. 1 , pp. 66-73
337 views DOI Abstract
2014
the racial question on the formation of brazilian social thinking – law 10639/03 – social services and the academy
Vol. 11 , No. 22 , pp. -
324 views Abstract
2014
the pomeranian music as a narrative of cultural memory
Vol. 11 , No. 21 , pp. -
315 views Abstract
2012
pelotas,“cidade de gays”: um estudo sobre os usos políticos de uma representação
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. -
292 views Abstract
2021
Malignancy is a risk factor for higher COVID-19 severity:A meta-analysis
, pp. -
166 views Abstract
2020
COVID-19, immune system response, hyperinflammation and repurposing anti-rheumatic drugs.
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Serum endocan level and diastolic functions in the case of lead exposure
Vol. 49 , No. 1 , pp. 66-73
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
Audiometric threshold shifts after total knee arthroplasty by using gentamicin-loaded bone cement
Vol. 49 , No. 2 , pp. 514-518
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Initial Regional Evaluation of Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Program: Data from Mediterranean Coast of Turkey.
419 views DOI Abstract
2018
Effect of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition on joint and muscle damage in rats with adjuvant arthritis
Vol. 48 , No. 3 , pp. 635-643
484 views DOI Abstract
2016
Long-term assessment of coronary care unit patient profile and outcomes: analyses of the 12-years patient records.
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 801-6
403 views DOI Abstract
2015
o conjunto lítico do sambaqui ilha das pedras, litoral sul, paraná: técnicas de produção e uso do espaço
Vol. 12 , No. 24 , pp. -
28 views Abstract
Journament Score
27.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,266 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

27.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

53.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.