Indexed in Journament

turk kardiyoloji dernegi arsivi

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,804 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
88 Articles
Scores higher than 80.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name turk kardiyoloji dernegi arsivi
Abbreviated Name turk kardiyoloji dernegi arsivi

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 74.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for turk kardiyoloji dernegi arsivi
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 5.7 7.8
Content Distribution 74.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (88)

2018
amorphous phase mediated crystallization: fundamentals of biomineralization
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 48-
420 views DOI Abstract
2016
synthesis, crystal structure of a novel mn complex with nicotinoyl-glycine
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 3-
379 views DOI Abstract
2018
co2 capture and crystallization of ammonia bicarbonate in a lab-scale scrubber
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 39-
373 views DOI Abstract
2015
crystal structures, thermal analysis, and dissolution behavior of new solid forms of the antiviral drug arbidol with dicarboxylic acids
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 650-669
345 views DOI Abstract
2016
temperature-dependent x-ray diffraction measurements of infrared superlattices grown by mbe
Vol. 6 , No. 11 , pp. 150-
343 views DOI Abstract
2018
sliding dynamics of parallel graphene sheets: effect of geometry and van der waals interactions on nano-spring behavior
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 149-
328 views DOI Abstract
2014
polarization rotation and monoclinic distortion in ferroelectric (bi0.5na0.5)tio3–batio3 single crystals under electric fields
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 273-295
324 views DOI Abstract
2020
the steps from batchwise to continuous crystallization for a fine chemical: a case study
Vol. 10 , No. 542 , pp. 542-
245 views DOI Abstract
2020
symmetry-adapted finite strain landau theory applied to kmnf<sub>3</sub>
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 124-
274 views DOI Abstract
2018
design of spin-frustrated monomer-type c60•− mott insulator
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 115-
255 views DOI Abstract
2018
structure and raman spectra of c60 and c70 fullerenes encased into single-walled boron nitride nanotubes: a theoretical study
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 118-
291 views DOI Abstract
2018
removal of so42− from li2co3 by recrystallization in na2co3 solution
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 19-
178 views DOI Abstract
2018
transition metal selenite halides: a fascinating family of magnetic compounds
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 159-
180 views DOI Abstract
2018
spatially nonuniform superconductivity in quasi-two-dimensional organic charge-transfer salts
Vol. 8 , No. 5 , pp. 183-
143 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,804 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.