Indexed in Journament

European journal of pharmacology

ISSN 1879-0712· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,187 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
103 Articles
Scores higher than 41.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Eur J Pharmacol
Abbreviated Name eur j pharmacol
ISSN 1879-0712
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/506087/description#description

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for European journal of pharmacology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 27.8 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.1 7.8
Content Distribution 57.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (103)

2019
Resveratrol protects cardiomyocytes against anoxia/reoxygenation via dephosphorylation of VDAC1 by Akt-GSK3 β pathway
Vol. 843 , pp. -
608 views Abstract
2019
Anti-tumor efficacy of phellamurin in osteosarcoma cells: Involvement of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.
Vol. 858 , pp. 172477
485 views DOI Abstract
2018
Sitagliptin prevents isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarction in rats by modulating nitric oxide synthase enzymes.
Vol. 829 , pp. 63-69
473 views DOI Abstract
2018
2019
Chiral ruthenium(II) complex Δ-[Ru(bpy)(o-FMPIP)] (bpy = bipyridine, o-FMPIP = 2-(2'-trifluoromethyphenyl) imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline) as potential apoptosis inducer via DNA damage.
Vol. 853 , pp. 49-55
391 views DOI Abstract
1979
Noradrenergic alpha 1 and alpha 2 receptors: autoradiographic visualization
Vol. 59 , No. 3-4 , pp. -
389 views Abstract
2019
Neurobehavioral effects of selected tobacco constituents in rodents following subchronic administration.
, pp. 172809
386 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tropisetron ameliorates cyclophosphamide-induced hemorrhagic cystitis in rats.
, pp. 173310
227 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effects of VAChT reduction and α7nAChR stimulation by PNU-282987 in lung inflammation in a model of chronic allergic airway inflammation.
, pp. 173239
207 views DOI Abstract
2020
Galantamine in rheumatoid arthritis: A cross talk of parasympathetic and sympathetic system regulates synovium-derived microRNAs and related pathogenic pathways.
, pp. 173315
310 views DOI Abstract
2020
Targeting CD52 does not affect murine neuron and microglia function
Vol. 871 , pp. 0-0
140 views DOI
2020
Evaluation of artesunate for the treatment of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma.
Vol. 872 , pp. 172953
321 views DOI Abstract
2020
In vitro benchmarking of NF-κB inhibitors.
, pp. 172981
348 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,187 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

27.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

57.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.