the journal of craniofacial surgery | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1935 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

the journal of craniofacial surgery

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name j craniofac surg
Abbreviated Name j craniofac surg
ISSN 1536-3732
Aim and Scope
URL https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/pages/default.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (79 total)

2011
Treatment outcomes of endoscopic repairs of sinonasal cerebrospinal fluid leaks
Lee DH;Lim SC;Joo YE;;
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. -
472 views Abstract
2019
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Between Composite and Dorsum Augmentation-Only Nasal Reconstructions With Diced Cartilage Graft Wrapped in Fascia.
Çerçi Özkan, Aret;Kozanoğlu, Erol;
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 1579-1583
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Tick-bite-induced Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Peripheral Facial Palsy.
Gökçe Kütük, Sinem;
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Surgical Management of Gunshot Injury to the Temporomandibular Joint.
Santos, Marcelo Soares Dos;Gonçalves, Kalyne Kelly Negromonte;Silva, Caio César Gonçalves;Diniz, Demóstenes Alves;Vasconcelos, Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito;
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: A Comparison With Two Open-Source Softwares.
Vellone, Valentino;Costantini, Ambra Maria;Ramieri, Valerio;Alunni Fegatelli, Danilo;Galluccio, Gabriella;Cascone, Piero;
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of New Bone Formation Using Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft Combined with Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Calvarial Defects.
Kizildağ, Alper;Taşdemir, Ufuk;Arabaci, Taner;Özmen, Özlem;Kizildağ, Canan Aksu;Iyilikci, Berrin;
Vol. 30 , No. 6 , pp. 1662-1666
351 views DOI Abstract
2016
Premaxillary Repositioning in the Severe Form of Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
Koh, Kyung S;Han, Woo Yeon;Jeong, Woo Shik;Oh, Tae Suk;Kwon, Sun Man;Choi, Jong Woo;
Vol. 27 , No. 6 , pp. 1440-4
335 views DOI Abstract
2017
patient-reported outcome assessment of inflammatory arthritis patient experience with intravenously administered biologic therapy
;Gaylis NB;Sagliani J;Black S;Tang KL;DeHoratius RJ;Kafka WA;Parenti D
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 1543-1553
331 views Abstract
2019
Approach to Feminization Surgery and Facial Masculinization Surgery: Aesthetic Goals and Principles of Management.
Deschamps-Braly, Jordan C;
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 1352-1358
329 views DOI Abstract
2016
a socioeconomic and behavioral survey of patients with difficult-to-control type 2 diabetes mellitus reveals an association between diabetic retinopathy and educational attainment
;Emoto N;Okajima F;Sugihara H;Goto R
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 2151-2162
329 views Abstract
View All 79 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.