Indexed in Journament

the journal of craniofacial surgery

ISSN 1536-3732· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.1/100
Journament Score
#9,916
Journament Rank
79
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name j craniofac surg
Abbreviated Name j craniofac surg
ISSN 1536-3732
URL https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/pages/default.aspx

Indexings

scopus ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (79)

2011
Treatment outcomes of endoscopic repairs of sinonasal cerebrospinal fluid leaks
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. -
523 views Abstract
2019
Surgical Management of Gunshot Injury to the Temporomandibular Joint.
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: A Comparison With Two Open-Source Softwares.
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of New Bone Formation Using Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft Combined with Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Calvarial Defects.
Vol. 30 , No. 6 , pp. 1662-1666
378 views DOI Abstract
2017
patient-reported outcome assessment of inflammatory arthritis patient experience with intravenously administered biologic therapy
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 1543-1553
369 views Abstract
2019
Approach to Feminization Surgery and Facial Masculinization Surgery: Aesthetic Goals and Principles of Management.
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 1352-1358
360 views DOI Abstract
2016
Premaxillary Repositioning in the Severe Form of Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
Vol. 27 , No. 6 , pp. 1440-4
358 views DOI Abstract
2020
Resorbable Versus Titanium Fixation of Le Fort I Osteotomy.
301 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Relationship Between Nasal Septal Deviation and Paranasal Pneumatization.
274 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of New Bone Formation Using Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft Combined with Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Calvarial Defects.
Vol. 30 , No. 6 , pp. 1662-1666
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: A Comparison With Two Open-Source Softwares.
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Analysis of the Curative Effect of the Anterior Approach to the Lower Cervical Spine for Cervicothoracic Spinal Tuberculosis.
178 views DOI Abstract
2019
Electromagnetic Navigation in Craniofacial Surgery Based on Automatic Registration of Dental Splints.
205 views DOI Abstract
2019
Early Pediatric Nasal Reconstruction Utilizing the Tagliacozzi Flap.
285 views DOI Abstract
2019
Novel Technique and Step-by-Step Construction of a Computer-Guided Stent for Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis.
308 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.