international review of management and marketing | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2207 / 33,944
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

international review of management and marketing

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name international review of management and marketing
Abbreviated Name international review of management and marketing
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (35 total)

2008
ferrule designs and stress distribution in endodontically treated upper central incisors: 3d finite element analysis
;A. Hassan Ahangari;A. Geramy;A. Valian
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 105-110
645 views Abstract
2013
antibacterial effect of diclofenac sodium on enterococcus faecalis
;Amin Salemmilani;Esrafil Balaei-Gajan;Saeed Rahimi;Zohreh Moosavi;Ardalan Abdollahi;Parvin Zakeri-Milani;Mehrdad Bolourian
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 16-22
544 views Abstract
2013
biomechanical effects of platform switching in two different implant systems: a three-dimensional finite element analysis
;Mahasti Sahabi;Mehdi Adibrad;Fatemeh Sadat Mirhashemi;Sareh Habibzadeh
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 338-350
534 views Abstract
2009
effect of nanofiller addition to an experimental dentin adhesive on microtensile bond strength to human dentin
;SH. Kasraei;M. Atai;Z. Khamverdi;S. Khalegh Nejad
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 91-96
509 views Abstract
2009
effect of orthodontic tooth movement on gingival crevicular fluid infiltration; a preliminary investigation
;A. Dannan;MA. Darwish;MN. Sawan
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 109-115
449 views Abstract
2008
gingival status of kidney transplanted patients referred to shariati general hospital, tehran
;G. Ali Gholami;G. Ansari;K. Seyedan;H. Gholami
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 137-141
402 views Abstract
2015
BRANDING ORIENTATION IN THE ACCOMMODATION INDUSTRY
Liow, Melissa Li Sa;Chai, Yeow Kim;
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 61-72
369 views Abstract
2014
A MULTINATIONAL COMPANY PROBLEM: INFILTRATING INTO THE CLUSTERS TO GAIN COMPETITIVE EDGE IN THE TRADITIONAL MARKETS
KOC, Murat;KOC, Fatih;
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 217-223
338 views Abstract
2013
association of il-8 (-251 a/t) gene polymorphism with clinical parameters and chronic periodontitis
;Hengameh Khosropanah;Eskandar Kamali Sarvestani;Ashkan Mahmoodi;Masoud Golshah
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 312-318
337 views Abstract
2012
ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTION AMONG SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE SUNYANI MUNICIPALITY
Opoku-Antwi, George Lord;Amofah, Kwaku;Nyamaah-Koffuor, Kofi;Yakubu, Abubakari;
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 210-219
327 views Abstract
View All 35 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.