current computer-aided drug design | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2495 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
34.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

current computer-aided drug design

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name curr comput aided drug des
Abbreviated Name curr comput aided drug des
ISSN 1875-6697
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (126 total)

2013
as implicações em justiça social da privatização nos modelos de governança da educação: um relato relacional
;Susan L. Robertson
Vol. 34 , No. 124 , pp. 679-703
670 views DOI Abstract
2019
Design And Molecular Docking Studies Of Some 2, 3 Di-Substituted Quinazolin-4-One Analogues Against Staphylococcus aureus UDG.
B, Amrute Bhavesh;D, Amrutkar Rakesh;R, Tambe Santosh;
566 views DOI Abstract
2020
Synthesis, admetSAR predictions, DPPH radical scavenging activity and potent anti-mycobacterial studies of hydrazones of substituted 4-(anilinomethyl)benzohydrazides (Part 2).
Desale, Vijay J;Mali, Suraj N;Thorat, Bapu R;Yamgar, Ramesh S;
456 views DOI Abstract
2019
Synthesis, antitumor activity, molecular docking and DFT study of Novel pyrimidiopyrazole derivatives.
Fahim, Asmaa M;Elshikh, Mohamed S;Darwish, Nora M;
393 views DOI Abstract
2020
Synthesis, In-silico and In-vitro analysis of hydrazones as potential antituberculosis agents.
Thorat, Bapu R;Mali, Suraj;Rani, Deepa;Yamgar, Ramesh;
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Molecular Docking based analysis to elucidate the DNA Topoisomerase IIβ as the potential target for the Ganoderic acid, A natural therapeutic agent in cancer therapy.
Kaushal, Sharma K;Brijendra, Singh;Mujwar, Somdutt;Prakash, Bisen S;
324 views DOI Abstract
2006
o prouni no governo lula e o jogo político em torno do acesso ao ensino superior the prouni in lula's administration and the political game around access to higher education
;Cristina Helena Almeida de Carvalho
Vol. 27 , No. 96 , pp. 979-1000
316 views DOI Abstract
2018
Polypharmacology Approach Against Migraine with Aura and Brain Edema for the Development of an Efficient Inhibitor and its Analogues.
Rizwan, Samawia;Mehmood, Asim;Khalid, Irum;Khan, Muhammad Saad;Yousafi, Qudsia;Kalsoom, Saima;Rashid, Hamid;
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 385-390
290 views DOI Abstract
2019
Combined QSAR model and chemical similarity search for novel HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for coronary heart disease.
Rajathei, David Mary;Parthasarathy, Subbiah;Selvaraj, Samuel;
287 views DOI Abstract
2013
Mathematical descriptors for the prediction of property, bioactivity, and toxicity of chemicals from their structure: a chemical-cum-biochemical approach.
Basak, Subhash C;
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 449-62
287 views Abstract
View All 126 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.