Indexed in Journament

current computer-aided drug design

ISSN 1875-6697· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,739 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
126 Articles
Scores higher than 42.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name curr comput aided drug des
Abbreviated Name curr comput aided drug des
ISSN 1875-6697

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 38.9
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 34.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for current computer-aided drug design
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 38.9 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.0 7.8
Content Distribution 34.4 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (126)

2013
2019
Synthesis, antitumor activity, molecular docking and DFT study of Novel pyrimidiopyrazole derivatives.
443 views DOI Abstract
2020
Synthesis, In-silico and In-vitro analysis of hydrazones as potential antituberculosis agents.
383 views DOI Abstract
2018
Polypharmacology Approach Against Migraine with Aura and Brain Edema for the Development of an Efficient Inhibitor and its Analogues.
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 385-390
375 views DOI Abstract
2003
competências na formação de professores no brasil: o que (não) há de novo competences in brazilian teacher education: what's (not) new
Vol. 24 , No. 85 , pp. 1155-1177
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
Combined QSAR model and chemical similarity search for novel HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for coronary heart disease.
332 views DOI Abstract
2020
Synthesis, In-silico and In-vitro analysis of hydrazones as potential antituberculosis agents.
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Synthesis, Antibacterial Activity and Molecular Docking of Phospholidinones in Stigmastane Series.
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 259-264
244 views DOI Abstract
2019
Combined QSAR model and chemical similarity search for novel HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for coronary heart disease.
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Synthesis, antitumor activity, molecular docking and DFT study of Novel pyrimidiopyrazole derivatives.
443 views DOI Abstract
2018
Polypharmacology Approach Against Migraine with Aura and Brain Edema for the Development of an Efficient Inhibitor and its Analogues.
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 385-390
375 views DOI Abstract
2016
grupos empresariais na educaÇÃo bÁsica pÚblica brasileira: limites À efetivaÇÃo do direito À educaÇÃo
Vol. 37 , No. 134 , pp. 113-131
168 views DOI Abstract
2016
desafios teÓrico-metodolÓgicos para as pesquisas em administraÇÃo/gestÃo educacional/escolar
Vol. 37 , No. 135 , pp. 465-480
190 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,739 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

34.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.