Indexed in Journament

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy

ISSN 0066-4804· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,680 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
105 Articles
Scores higher than 80.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Antimicrob Agents Chemother
Abbreviated Name antimicrob agents chemother
ISSN 0066-4804
URL http://aac.asm.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 39.7 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 9.3 7.8
Content Distribution 67.6 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (105)

2007
Targeted intranasal mupirocin to prevent colonization and infection by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in soldiers: a cluster randomized controlled trial
Vol. 51 , No. 10 , pp. -
629 views Abstract
1994
1993
Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients
Vol. 37 , No. 5 , pp. -
535 views Abstract
1999
Antimicrobial resistance of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli isolated from children under the age of 5 years from Ifakara, Tanzania
Vol. 43 , No. 12 , pp. -
495 views Abstract
1991
Bacteremia caused by hemolytic, high-level gentamicin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis
Vol. 35 , No. 8 , pp. -
494 views Abstract
1996
Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in fecal flora of cancer patients receiving norfloxacin prophylaxis
Vol. 40 , No. 2 , pp. -
486 views Abstract
1996
Phase I study of intravenous ribavirin treatment of respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia after marrow transplantation
Vol. 40 , No. 11 , pp. -
478 views Abstract
2023
Individual meropenem epithelial lining fluid and plasma PK/PD target attainment.
Vol. 67 , No. 12 , pp. e0072723
65 views DOI Abstract
2020
Early bactericidal activity trial of nitazoxanide for pulmonary tuberculosis.
341 views DOI Abstract
2020
Fourteen-Day Bactericidal Activity, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Linezolid in Adults with Drug-Sensitive Pulmonary Tuberculosis.
307 views DOI Abstract
2020
CORRELATION OF LINEZOLID HAIR CONCENTRATIONS WITH PLASMA EXPOSURE IN PATIENTS WITH DRUG-RESISTANT TB.
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Rifampin-Isoniazid-Containing Antituberculosis Therapy on Efavirenz Pharmacokinetics in HIV-Infected Children 3 to 14 Years Old.
Vol. 63 , No. 1
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
Role of Viscoelasticity in Bacterial Killing by Antimicrobials in Differently Grown Biofilms.
Vol. 63 , No. 4
271 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,680 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

39.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.