acta botânica brasílica | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1113 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

acta botânica brasílica

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name acta botânica brasílica
Abbreviated Name acta botânica brasílica
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (435 total)

2019
Cereus jamacaru DC. (Cactaceae): From 17 th century naturalists to modern day scientific and technological prospecting
Silva, Luana Fernanda Costa Raulino;Valle, Luci de Senna;Nascimento, Ana Regina Campos;Medeiros, Maria Franco Trindade;
, pp. -
390 views Abstract
2003
Nova espécie de Galium L. (Rubiaceae) para o Estado de São Paulo, Brasil
L., Jung-Mendaçolli Sigrid;
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 605-608
352 views Abstract
2019
internal hydrophobization of cement mortar by addition of siloxanes
;Grabowska Kalina;Koniorczyk Marcin
Vol. 282 , pp. 02030-
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Wild vegetables do not lie: Comparative gastronomic ethnobotany and ethnolinguistics on the greek traces of the mediterranean diet of southeastern Italy
Pieroni, A.
Vol. 33 , pp. 198-211
342 views DOI
2004
Respostas de Acacia mangium Willd e Sclerolobium paniculatum Vogel a fungos micorrízicos arbusculares nativos provenientes de áreas degradadas pela mineração de bauxita na Amazônia Responses of Acacia mangium Willd and Sclerolobium paniculatum Vogel to native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from remaining areas of bauxite mining in Amazon
Marinho, Ney Freitas;Caproni, Ana Lucy;Franco, Avílio Antônio;Berbara, Ricardo Luís Louro;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 141-149
339 views Abstract
2003
Floristic and phytosociology of arboreal deciduous thorny vegetation remnant at Caruaru, in Pernambuco
Alcoforado-Filho, F.
Vol. 17 , pp. 287-303
326 views DOI
2018
making organic fertilizer resistant to bacterial leaf blight disease for grain crops
;Rifki Mohammad;Hanifianto Luqman;Rachmania Juliastuti Sri;Darmawan Raden;Hendrianie Nuniek
Vol. 156 , pp. 03026-
316 views DOI Abstract
2010
Floristics, phytosociology and diversity of tree vegetation in gallery forests of Sete Cidades National Park (PNSC), Piauí, Brazil
Matos, M.
Vol. 24 , pp. 483-496
315 views
2019
Updates on extratropical region climbing plant flora: News regarding a still-neglected diversity
Durigon, J.
Vol. 33 , pp. 644-653
307 views DOI
2004
Phytosociology in parts of vegetation from campo maior complex in Campo Maior municipality, Piauí state, Brazil
De, Farias R.
Vol. 18 , pp. 949-963
302 views DOI
View All 435 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.