molecular microbiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1197 / 33,917
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

molecular microbiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name mol microbiol
Abbreviated Name molecular microbiology
ISSN 1365-2958
Aim and Scope
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2958
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (28 total)

2019
Protein kinase B controls Mycobacterium tuberculosis growth via phosphorylation of the transcriptional regulator Lsr2 at threonine 112.
Alqaseer, Kawther;Turapov, Obolbek;Barthe, Philippe;Jagatia, Heena;De Visch, Angélique;Roumestand, Christian;Wegrzyn, Malgorzata;Bartek, Iona L;Voskuil, Martin I;O'Hare, Helen M;Ajuh, Paul;Bottrill, Andrew R;Witney, Adam A;Cohen-Gonsaud, Martin;Waddell, Simon J;Mukamolova, Galina V;
438 views DOI Abstract
2020
New insights into the mycobacterial PE and PPE proteins provide a framework for future research.
Ates, Louis S;
Vol. 113 , No. 1 , pp. 4-21
354 views DOI Abstract
2020
Dissemination and conservation of cadmium and arsenic resistance determinants in Listeria and other Gram-positive bacteria.
Parsons, Cameron;Lee, Sangmi;Kathariou, Sophia;
344 views DOI Abstract
2018
Mating-type factor-specific regulation of the fumagillin/pseurotin secondary metabolite supercluster in Aspergillus fumigatus
Yu, Y.
Vol. 110 , pp. 1045-1065
343 views DOI
2001
a maternidade e o feminismo: diálogo com as ciências sociais
;Lucila Scavone
, No. 16 , pp. 137-150
341 views DOI
2010
"as mulheres são más": pessoa, gênero e doença no sul de moçambique "women are evil": personhood, gender and illness in mozambique
;Luiz Henrique Passador
, No. 35 , pp. 177-210
310 views DOI Abstract
2003
Regulatory and functional co-operation of flagella and type 1 pill in adhesive and invasive abilities of AIEC strain LF82 isolated from a patient with Crohn's disease
Barnich, N.
Vol. 48 , pp. 781-794
285 views DOI
2008
a angústia dos corpos indóceis: prostituição e conflito armado na colômbia contemporânea the anguish of indocile bodies: prostitution and the armed conflict in contemporary colombia
;José Miguel Nieto Olivar
, No. 31 , pp. 365-397
280 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identification of IscU residues critical for de novo iron-sulfur cluster assembly.
Tanaka, Naoyuki;Yuda, Eiki;Fujishiro, Takashi;Hirabayashi, Kei;Wada, Kei;Takahashi, Yasuhiro;
269 views DOI Abstract
2004
obesidade como deficiência: o caso dos judeus fat as disability: the case of jews
;Sander L. Gilman
, No. 23 , pp. 329-353
267 views DOI Abstract
View All 28 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.