Indexed in Journament

journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics

ISSN 01676105· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,724 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
24 Articles
Scores higher than 42.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Краткое название journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics
Сокращённое название journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics
ISSN 01676105
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-wind-engineering-and-industrial-aerodynamics

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 11.1 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.1 7.8
Content Distribution 77.7 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2015
the outsourcing of resource management of medical institutions
;Оксана Владимировна ГАЙДАЕНКО;Константин Викторович КОШКИН;Петр Николаевич УДОВИЧЕНКО
Vol. 4 , No. 2(1111) , pp. 35-40
444 views DOI Abstract
2017
the proactive management model of strategic development project on the energy supply companies in a turbulent environment
;Михайло Збишекович ДОМБРОВСЬКИЙ;Анатолій Олексійович САЧЕНКО
Vol. 7 , No. 2(1224) , pp. 41-45
403 views DOI Abstract
2016
methods of selecting the effective models of buildings reprofiling projects
;Александр Иванович МЕНЕЙЛЮК;Лилия Вячеславовна ЛОБАКОВА
Vol. 5 , No. 1(1173) , pp. 76-81
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Research on non-stationary wind-induced effects and the working mechanism of full scale super-large cooling tower based on field measurement
Wang H.
Vol. 184 , pp. 61-76
396 views DOI
2019
Research on non-stationary wind-induced effects and the working mechanism of full scale super-large cooling tower based on field measurement
Wang H.
Vol. 184 , pp. 61-76
353 views DOI
2016
information technology of giving definition of the complex index of quality in creating a trip route in the projects of urban passenger transport
;Наталія Василівна ДАВІДІЧ;Дмитрий Миколайович БУГАС;Микола Павлович ПАН;Ігор Володимирович ЧУМАЧЕНКО
Vol. 5 , No. 1(1173) , pp. 19-23
351 views DOI Abstract
2017
СИСТЕМНИЙ АНАЛІЗ ПЕРЕДУМОВ ІНІЦІАЦІЇ ПРОЕКТІВ РЕМОНТУ ТА УТРИМАННЯ АВТОМОБІЛЬНИХ ДОРІГ
;Аліна Павлівна ПАРАСОЧКА;Вікторія Олександрівна ХРУТЬБА
Vol. 8 , No. 3(1225) , pp. 70-76
350 views DOI Abstract
2015
management of construction time at the restoration of the ostankino tv tower
;Михаил Николаевич ЕРШОВ;Александр Иванович МЕНЕЙЛЮК;Лилия Вячеславовна ЛОБАКОВА
Vol. 4 , No. 2(1111) , pp. 96-101
342 views DOI Abstract
2015
formation of investment portfolio based on utility index and project risks
;Наталья Валентиновна ГАЙДУКОВА
Vol. 2 , No. 3(1046) , pp. 121-126
339 views DOI Abstract
2015
ecological and economic efficiency of a portfolio of projects of transport enterprises
;Вікторія Олександрівна ХРУТЬБА;Ганна Олександрівна ВАЙГАНГ;Андрій Сергійович ХРУТЬБА
Vol. 3 , No. 1(1110) , pp. 90-96
304 views DOI Abstract
2019
An experimental investigation of the aerodynamic flows created by lorries travelling in a long platoon
Robertson, F.
Vol. 193 , pp. 0-0
193 views DOI
2019
An aerodynamic anti-galloping technique of iced 8-bundled conductors in ultra-high-voltage transmission lines
Lou, W.
Vol. 193 , pp. 0-0
229 views DOI
2019
Research on non-stationary wind-induced effects and the working mechanism of full scale super-large cooling tower based on field measurement
Wang H.
Vol. 184 , pp. 61-76
396 views DOI
2019
Research on non-stationary wind-induced effects and the working mechanism of full scale super-large cooling tower based on field measurement
Wang H.
Vol. 184 , pp. 61-76
353 views DOI
2017
СИСТЕМНИЙ АНАЛІЗ ПЕРЕДУМОВ ІНІЦІАЦІЇ ПРОЕКТІВ РЕМОНТУ ТА УТРИМАННЯ АВТОМОБІЛЬНИХ ДОРІГ
;Аліна Павлівна ПАРАСОЧКА;Вікторія Олександрівна ХРУТЬБА
Vol. 8 , No. 3(1225) , pp. 70-76
350 views DOI Abstract
2017
multi-agent model of safety management in planning projects for the creation of objects with mass stay of people
;Олег Богданович ЗАЧКО;Роман Русланович ГОЛОВАТИЙ
Vol. 7 , No. 2(1224) , pp. 46-51
206 views DOI Abstract
2017
the proactive management model of strategic development project on the energy supply companies in a turbulent environment
;Михайло Збишекович ДОМБРОВСЬКИЙ;Анатолій Олексійович САЧЕНКО
Vol. 7 , No. 2(1224) , pp. 41-45
403 views DOI Abstract
2016
decision support model in projects of complex objects protection potential danger
;Роман Юрійович СУКАЧ;Юрій Павлович РАК
Vol. 6 , No. 2(1174) , pp. 99-102
244 views DOI Abstract
2016
coordination levels of configuration for systems and products, and projects
;Петро Петрович САВЧУК;Микола Анатолійович ДЕМИДЮК;Олена Миколаївна СІВАКОВСЬКА
Vol. 5 , No. 1(1173) , pp. 56-60
208 views DOI Abstract
2016
educational projects stakeholder management
;Юлія Юріївна ГУСЄВА;Марина Володимирівна СИДОРЕНКО;Ігор Володимирович ЧУМАЧЕНКО
Vol. 6 , No. 2(1174) , pp. 8-12
260 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,724 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.