Indexed in Journament

journal of applied botany and food quality

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #2,948 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
93 Articles
Scores higher than 89.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of applied botany and food quality
Abbreviated Name journal of applied botany and food quality
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 73.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of applied botany and food quality
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 4.3 4.2
Content Distribution 73.7 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (93)

2010
modificações vocais acústicas espectrográficas produzidas pela fonação reversa spectrography acoustic vocal modifications produced by reverse phonation
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 535-542
512 views Abstract
2007
análise acústica da voz do idoso: caracterização da freqüência fundamental acoustic analysis of aging voice: fundamental frequency characterization
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 238-247
487 views DOI Abstract
2011
efeito imediato de técnicas vocais em mulheres sem queixa vocal immediate effect of vocal techniques in women without vocal complaint
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 886-895
452 views Abstract
2013
análise das medidas aerodinâmicas no português brasileiro por meio do método multiparamétrico de avaliação vocal objetiva assistida (eva) analysis of aerodynamic measures in brazilian portuguese through multiparameter assessment method vocal objective assist (eva)
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 119-127
437 views Abstract
2011
avaliação audiológica pré-cirurgia otológica de indivíduos com fissura labiopalatina operada pre-surgical auditory assessment of subjects with operated cleft lip and palate
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 271-280
435 views Abstract
2015
Investigations of anthocyanins, organic acids, and sugars show great variability in nutritional value of European cranberry (Vaccinium oxycoccos) fruit
Vol. 88 , pp. -
434 views Abstract
2012
habilidades cognitivo-linguísticas e sua relação com características respiratórias cognitive-linguistic skills and their relationship with respiratory characteristics
, No. ahead , pp. 0-
404 views DOI Abstract
2009
o reconto de histórias em crianças do espectro autístico: um estudo preliminar retelling a story in autistic spectrum children: a preliminary study
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 417-422
403 views Abstract
2009
autismo: uma avaliação transdisciplinar baseada no programa teacch autism: a transdisciplinary approach based on teacch program
Vol. 11 , pp. 217-226
394 views DOI Abstract
2016
impacto da voz na comunicação social e emoção de professoras antes e após fonoterapia
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 470-480
354 views DOI Abstract
2016
potenciais evocados auditivos de tronco encefálico em fumantes
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 47-54
234 views DOI Abstract
2016
aspectos clínicos e psicossociais avaliados por critérios de diagnóstico para disfunção temporomandibular
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 113-119
195 views DOI Abstract
2015
desenvolvimento da linguagem e deficiência auditiva: revisão de literatura
Vol. 17 , No. 6 , pp. 2044-2055
272 views DOI Abstract
2015
o copinho oferecido pelos cuidadores aos recém-nascidos prematuros hospitalizados
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 1270-1277
326 views DOI Abstract
2015
grupo para sujeitos com queixas de dificuldades de leitura e escrita: aspectos teórico-metodológicos
Vol. 17 , No. 6 , pp. 1814-1826
180 views DOI Abstract
2015
deformidades dentofaciais: características miofuncionais orofaciais
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 1202-1214
146 views DOI Abstract
2015
relações entre aspectos ortográficos e fonético-fonológicos de fonemas oclusivos
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 775-782
169 views DOI Abstract
2015
ocorrência de disfunção temporomandibular em indivíduos com deformidade dentofacial
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 1215-1221
169 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #2,948 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.