Indexed in Journament

industrial and engineering chemistry research

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,122 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
53 Articles
Scores higher than 21.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nom Abrégé industrial and engineering chemistry research
Nom Abrégé industrial and engineering chemistry research

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 2.1
Content Distribution 62.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for industrial and engineering chemistry research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.2
Accessibility 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 5.6 28.3
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 2.1 11.5
Content Distribution 62.4 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (53)

2015
immunohistochemical study of macrophages subpopulations associated with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue, with and without metastasis
Vol. 51 , No. 6 , pp. 415-421
382 views DOI Abstract
2005
diagnóstico laboratorial da infecção pelo vírus herpes simples (hsv) em pacientes transplantados e não-transplantados laboratorial diagnosis of herpes simplex virus infection (hsv) in transplanted and non-transplanted patients
Vol. 41 , No. 4 , pp. 257-262
354 views DOI Abstract
2013
immunoexpression of cell cycle biomarkers in neuroblastoma samples and its correlation with prognostic factors imunoexpressão de biomarcadores do ciclo celular em amostras de neuroblastomas e sua relação com fatores prognósticos
Vol. 49 , No. 1 , pp. 57-63
339 views Abstract
2010
comparação entre dois métodos de detecção de dna de papilomavírus humano em carcinoma epidermoide de lábio comparison between two methods for human papilomavírus dna detection in lip squamous cell carcinoma
Vol. 46 , No. 2 , pp. 85-90
310 views DOI Abstract
2006
aspectos gerais e diagnóstico clinicolaboratorial da intoxicação por paraquat general aspects and clinical laboratorial diagnostic of poisoning by paraquat
Vol. 42 , No. 4 , pp. 235-243
309 views DOI Abstract
2015
publications generated from abstracts presented at the 28thcongresso brasileiro de patologia and the 28th congreso de la sociedad latinoamericana de patologia, in 2011
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 240-245
308 views DOI Abstract
2007
candidíase vulvovaginal: fatores predisponentes do hospedeiro e virulência das leveduras vulvovaginal candidiasis: susceptibility factors of the host and virulence of the yeasts
Vol. 43 , No. 5 , pp. 319-327
306 views DOI Abstract
2015
molecular biology techniques for loss of heterozygosity detection: the glioma example
Vol. 51 , No. 3 , pp. 189-196
254 views DOI Abstract
2015
giant epignathus of the palate: a case report
Vol. 51 , No. 5 , pp. 339-343
213 views DOI Abstract
2015
detection and genotyping of hpv in women with indeterminate cytology and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions
Vol. 51 , No. 3 , pp. 166-172
264 views DOI Abstract
2015
giant retroperitoneal myelolipoma: case report and literature review
Vol. 51 , No. 1 , pp. 48-51
162 views DOI Abstract
2015
inflammatory fibroid polyp (vanek’s polyp): a case report and literature review
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 117-120
20 views DOI Abstract
2015
immunohistochemical study of macrophages subpopulations associated with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue, with and without metastasis
Vol. 51 , No. 6 , pp. 415-421
382 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,122 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.