chemistry of heterocyclic compounds | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1233 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

chemistry of heterocyclic compounds

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name chemistry of heterocyclic compounds
Abbreviated Name chemistry of heterocyclic compounds
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/10593
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (155 total)

2002
<sup>14</sup> N and <sup>15</sup> N NMR spectroscopy of 2-methyl-4,5-dinitro-1,2,3-triazole and of substituted 2-methyl-4(5)-nitro-1,2,3-triazole 1-oxides
Strelenko, Y.
Vol. 38 , pp. 547-552
411 views DOI
2004
influence of the surgical manipulation of the colon in colonic induced carcinogenesis in rats influencia de la manipulación quirúrgica del colon en la carcinogénesis cólica inducida en ratas
;J. F. Noguera Aguilar;I. Amengual Antich;A. Plaza Martínez;C. Tortajada Collado;J. M. Morón Canis;J. J. Pujol Tugores
Vol. 96 , No. 5 , pp. 322-330
376 views Abstract
2006
informed consent document in gastrointestinal endoscopy: understanding and acceptance by patients estudio del grado de entendimiento y aceptación por nuestros pacientes de los consentimientos informados utilizados para endoscopia
;J. J. Vila;F. J. Jiménez;M. Iñarrairaegui;C. Prieto;O. Nantes;F. Borda
Vol. 98 , No. 2 , pp. 101-111
375 views Abstract
2009
efficacy of pediatric colonoscopy used as push enteroscopy in the management of capsule endoscopy findings eficacia del colonoscopio pediátrico como enteroscopio de pulsión en el manejo de los hallazgos de la cápsula endoscópica
;F. Pérez Roldán;P. González Carro;M. L. Legaz Huidobro;O. Roncero García-Escribano;M. Ynfante Ferrús;S. Aoufi;N. Sánchez-Manjavacas Muñoz;F. Ruiz Carrillo
Vol. 101 , No. 7 , pp. 468-476
369 views Abstract
2010
coeliac disease in china: a field waiting for exploration enfermedad celiaca en chica: un campo pendiente de ser explorado
;J. Wu;B. Xia;B. M.E. von Blomberg;C. Zhao;X. W. Yang;J. B. A. Crusius;A. S. Peña
Vol. 102 , No. 8 , pp. 472-477
353 views Abstract
2011
predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding factores predictivos de mortalidad intrahospitalaria en pacientes con sangrado de tubo digestivo alto no variceal
;José Alberto González-González;Genaro Vázquez-Elizondo;Diego García-Compeán;Juan Obed Gaytán-Torres;Ángel Ricardo Flores-Rendón;Joel Omar Jáquez-Quintana;Aldo Azael Garza-Galindo;Martha Graciela Cárdenas-Sandoval;Héctor Jesús Maldonado-Garza
Vol. 103 , No. 4 , pp. 196-203
352 views Abstract
economic evaluation of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of dysplastic barrett's esophagus in spain
;José-Miguel Esteban;Pedro González-Carro;Joan-B. Gornals;Carlos Collados;María Álvarez;Alejandro Pérez-Mitru;Suzan Serip
Vol. 110 , No. 3 , pp. 145-154
343 views DOI Abstract
2005
association between angiogenesis soluble factors and disease progression markers in chronic hepatitis c patients asociación entre factores angiogénicos solubles y marcadores de progresión de la enfermedad en pacientes con hepatitis crónica c
;X. Salcedo Mora;P. Sanz-Cameno;J. Medina;S. Martín-Vílchez;L. García-Buey;M. J. Borque;R. Moreno-Otero
Vol. 97 , No. 10 , pp. 699-706
319 views Abstract
2008
medida del tamaño de las lesiones con cápsula endoscópica: un problema por resolver measurement of lesion size by capsule endoscopy: an unsolved issue
;B. Velayos;M. F. Muñoz;L. Fernández;R. Aller;F. Lozano;F. de la Calle;L. del Olmo;T. Arranz;J. M. González
Vol. 100 , No. 4 , pp. 248-249
313 views
2011
kaposi's sarcoma of the rectum sarcoma de kaposi del recto
;Sheila Ferreira;Bruno Arroja;Manuela Canhoto;Cristina Amado;Claudia Gonçalves
Vol. 103 , No. 4 , pp. 209-210
296 views
View All 155 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.