Indexed in Journament

Therapeutic drug monitoring

ISSN 1536-3694· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,041 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
73 Articles
Scores higher than 89.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Ther Drug Monit
Abbreviated Name ther drug monit
ISSN 1536-3694
URL http://journals.lww.com/drug-monitoring/pages/default.aspx

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 68.3 25.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 4.1
Content Distribution 46.0 89.1
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (73)

2019
Synthetic cathinones and their potential interactions with prescription drugs.
Contrucci, Ramon R;Brunt, Tibor M;Inan, Funda;Franssen, Eric J F;Hondebrink, Laura;
475 views DOI Abstract
2010
Computer-assisted cyclosporine dosing performs better than traditional dosing in renal transplant recipients: results of a pilot study.
Asberg, Anders;Falck, Pål;Undset, Liv H;Dørje, Christina;Holdaas, Hallvard;Hartmann, Anders;Midtvedt, Karsten;
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 152-8
448 views DOI Abstract
2017
Relationship Between the CYP2C19 Phenotype Using the Voriconazole-to-Voriconazole N-Oxide Plasma Concentration Ratio and Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Japanese Patients With Different CYP2C19 Genotypes.
Niioka, Takenori;Fujishima, Naohito;Abumiya, Maiko;Yamashita, Takaya;Ubukawa, Kumi;Nara, Miho;Fujishima, Masumi;Takahashi, Naoto;Miura, Masatomo;
Vol. 39 , No. 5 , pp. 514-521
415 views DOI Abstract
2008
Suboptimal aminoglycoside dosing in critically ill patients
Rea RS;Capitano B;Bies R;Bigos KL;Smith R;Lee H;;
Vol. 30 , No. 6 , pp. -
402 views Abstract
1999
Impact of goal-oriented and model-based clinical pharmacokinetic dosing of aminoglycosides on clinical outcome: a cost-effectiveness analysis
van Lent-Evers NA;Mathôt RA;Geus WP;van Hout BA;Vinks AA;;
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. -
397 views Abstract
2016
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Everolimus: A Consensus Report.
Shipkova, Maria;Hesselink, Dennis A;Holt, David W;Billaud, Eliane M;van Gelder, Teun;Kunicki, Paweł K;Brunet, Mercè;Budde, Klemens;Barten, Markus J;De Simone, Paolo;Wieland, Eberhard;López, Olga Millán;Masuda, Satohiro;Seger, Christoph;Picard, Nicolas;Oellerich, Michael;Langman, Loralie J;Wallemacq, Pierre;Morris, Raymond G;Thompson, Carol;Marquet, Pierre;
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 143-69
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Tacrolimus area under the concentration versus time curve monitoring, using home-based volumetric absorptive capillary microsampling.
Gustavsen, Marte Theie;Midtvedt, Karsten;Vethe, Nils Tore;Robertsen, Ida;Bergan, Stein;Åsberg, Anders;
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Limited Sampling Strategies Supporting Individualized Dose Adjustment of Intravenous Busulfan in Children and Young Adults.
Teitelbaum, Zvi;Nassar, Laila;Scherb, Inna;Fink, Dorit;Ring, Gil;Lurie, Yael;Krivoy, Norberto;Bentur, Yedidia;Efrati, Edna;Kurnik, Daniel;
363 views DOI Abstract
2017
Intrapatient Variability in the Pharmacokinetics of Etanercept Maintenance Treatment.
van Bezooijen, Ji S;Schreurs, Marco W J;Koch, Birgit C P;Velthuis, Henk Te;van Doorn, Martijn B A;Prens, Errol P;van Gelder, Teun;
Vol. 39 , No. 4 , pp. 333-338
356 views DOI Abstract
2020
Case of Suboptimal Linezolid Exposure: Is There a Role for Pharmacogenetics?
Baldelli, Sara;Montrasio, Cristina;Cheli, Stefania;Viganò, Ottavia;Bini, Teresa;Egidi, Marcello;Cattaneo, Dario;
Vol. 42 , No. 2 , pp. 347-348
353 views DOI
2024
Therapeutic Monitoring of Palbociclib, Ribociclib, Abemaciclib, M2, M20, and Letrozole in Human Plasma: A Novel LC-MS/MS Method.
Posocco, Bianca;Zanchetta, Martina;Orleni, Marco;Gagno, Sara;Montico, Marcella;Peruzzi, Elena;Roncato, Rossana;Gerratana, Lorenzo;Corsetti, Serena;Puglisi, Fabio;Toffoli, Giuseppe;
Vol. 46 , No. 4 , pp. 485-493
138 views DOI Abstract
2023
Bioanalytical Methods for Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Quantification: A Review for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.
Orleni, Marco;Canil, Giovanni;Posocco, Bianca;Gagno, Sara;Toffoli, Giuseppe;
Vol. 45 , No. 3 , pp. 306-317
154 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pharmacologic treatment of transplant recipients infected with SARS-CoV-2: considerations regarding therapeutic drug monitoring and drug-drug interactions.
Elens, Laure;Langman, Loralie J;Hesselink, Dennis A;Bergan, Stein;Moes, Dirk Jan A R;Molinaro, Mariadelfina;Venkataramanan, Raman;Lemaitre, Florian;
324 views DOI Abstract
2020
Case of Suboptimal Linezolid Exposure: Is There a Role for Pharmacogenetics?
Baldelli, Sara;Montrasio, Cristina;Cheli, Stefania;Viganò, Ottavia;Bini, Teresa;Egidi, Marcello;Cattaneo, Dario;
Vol. 42 , No. 2 , pp. 347-348
353 views DOI
2020
Impact of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antiretroviral Drugs in Routine Clinical Management of People Living With HIV: A Narrative Review
Cattaneo, D.
Vol. 42 , pp. 64-74
269 views DOI
2019
Interior Temperature and Relative Humidity of an Envelope During Mail Transport by the Japan Post in the Summer: Preliminary Study for a Stability Test of Dried Blood Spot Samples Sent as Regular Mail
Mukai, Y.
Vol. 41 , pp. 628-633
260 views DOI
2019
Synthetic cathinones and their potential interactions with prescription drugs.
Contrucci, Ramon R;Brunt, Tibor M;Inan, Funda;Franssen, Eric J F;Hondebrink, Laura;
475 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is There a Temporal Relationship Between Trough Whole Blood Tacrolimus Concentration and Acute Rejection in the First 14 Days After Kidney Transplantation?
Hu, R.
Vol. 41 , pp. 528-532
314 views DOI
2019
Tacrolimus area under the concentration versus time curve monitoring, using home-based volumetric absorptive capillary microsampling.
Gustavsen, Marte Theie;Midtvedt, Karsten;Vethe, Nils Tore;Robertsen, Ida;Bergan, Stein;Åsberg, Anders;
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Limited Sampling Strategies Supporting Individualized Dose Adjustment of Intravenous Busulfan in Children and Young Adults.
Teitelbaum, Zvi;Nassar, Laila;Scherb, Inna;Fink, Dorit;Ring, Gil;Lurie, Yael;Krivoy, Norberto;Bentur, Yedidia;Efrati, Edna;Kurnik, Daniel;
363 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,041 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

68.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

46.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.