Indexed in Journament

The Classical Review

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,371 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
79 Articles
Scores higher than 20.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name The Classical Review
Abbreviated Name the classical review

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 64.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 3.6 13.4
Content Distribution 64.4 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (79)

2018
the optic nerve head perfusion and its correlation with the macular blood perfusion in unilateral idiopathic macular hole: an optical coherence tomography angiography study
;Xin-Xin Liu;Yu-Fei Teng;Meng Gao;Xi-Da Liang;Yan-Ping Yu;Wu Liu
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 438-444
588 views DOI Abstract
2013
comparison of visual acuity, refractive results and complications of femtosecond laser with mechanical microkeratome in lasik
;Murat Moray;Tansu Gonen;Cemile Banu Cosar;Asim Bozkurt Sener
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 350-355
553 views DOI Abstract
2014
association of apolipoprotein e-219t>g promoter polymorphism with primary open angle glaucoma in turkish population
;Emel Saglar;Banu Bozkurt;Murat Irkec
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 426-430
546 views DOI Abstract
2018
change in foveal position based on age and axial length in high myopic eyes
;Qian Zhang;Kaddie Kwok Chen;Wei-Feng Liu;Guo-Fu Huang
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 844-847
516 views DOI Abstract
2015
ocular biometry in the adult population in rural central china:a population-based, cross-sectional study
;Ting Fu;Yin-Wei Song;Zhi-Qi Chen;Jun-Wen He;Kun Qiao;Xu-Fang Sun;Hong Zhang;Jun-Ming Wang
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 812-817
465 views DOI Abstract
2013
a randomized controlled trial of omega-3 fatty acids in dry eye syndrome
;Rahul Bhargava;Prachi Kumar;Manjushrii Kumar;Namrata Mehra;Anurag Mishra
Vol. 6 , No. 6 , pp. 811-816
443 views DOI Abstract
2015
pterygium epithelium abnormal differentiation related to activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathway in vitro
;Juan Peng;Xiang-Yin Sha;Yi Liu;Rui-Ming Yang;Ye Wen
Vol. 8 , No. 6 , pp. 1118-1125
417 views DOI Abstract
2017
role of short-wavelength filtering lenses in delaying myopia progression and amelioration of asthenopia in juveniles
;Hai-Lan Zhao;Jin Jiang;Jie Yu;Hai-Ming Xu
Vol. 10 , No. 8 , pp. 1261-1267
404 views DOI Abstract
2017
mathematical analysis of corneal remodelling after intracorneal ring surgery in keratoconus
;Elias F. Jarade;Elise Slim;Carole Cherfan;Hala El Rami;Toufic Hassan;Elias Chelala
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 348-354
375 views DOI Abstract
2012
pi3k/akt/mtor signaling pathway inhibitors in proliferation of retinal pigment epithelial cells
;Na Cai;Shun-Dong Dai;Ning-Ning Liu;Li-Min Liu;Ning Zhao;Lei Chen
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. 675-680
364 views DOI Abstract
2020
identification of an immune-related signature for the prognosis of uveal melanoma
;Ying-Zi Li;Ying Huang;Xiang-Yang Deng;Chang-Sen Tu
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 458-465
224 views DOI Abstract
2018
current approaches and future directions in the management of pterygium
;Kyoung Woo Kim;Jae Chan Kim
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 709-711
138 views DOI Abstract
2018
protective effects of rutin against methanol induced acute toxic optic neuropathy: an experimental study
;Nurdan Gamze Taşlı;Ferda Keskin Çimen;Yücel Karakurt;Turgay Uçak;Renad Mammadov;Bahadır Süleyman;Nezahat Kurt;Halis Süleyman
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 780-785
292 views DOI Abstract
2018
clinical outcomes after implantation of a new intrastromal corneal ring with 140-degree of arc in patients with corneal ectasia
;Jordana Sandes;Larissa R. S. Stival;Marcos Pereira de Ávila;Paulo Ferrara;Guilherme Ferrara;Leopoldo Magacho;Luana P. N. Araújo;Leonardo Torquetti
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 802-806
183 views DOI Abstract
2018
comparison of myopia control between toric and spherical periphery design orthokeratology in myopic children with moderate-to-high corneal astigmatism
;Yu Zhang;Yue-Guo Chen
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 650-655
334 views DOI Abstract
2018
femtosecond laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in phototherapeutic keratectomy versus the big-bubble technique in keratoconus
;Jarbas Pereira de Macedo;Lauro Augusto de Oliveira;Flavio Hirai;Luciene Barbosa de Sousa
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 807-812
248 views DOI Abstract
2018
change in foveal position based on age and axial length in high myopic eyes
;Qian Zhang;Kaddie Kwok Chen;Wei-Feng Liu;Guo-Fu Huang
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 844-847
516 views DOI Abstract
2018
association between visual status and mental health status in thai rural elderly: a community-based study
;Pear Pongsachareonnont;Nopphawan Uramphorn;Nuchanad Hounnaklang
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 852-857
300 views DOI Abstract
2018
analysis of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and inner macular layers by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for detection of early glaucoma
;Pei-Wen Lin;Hsueh-Wen Chang;Jih-Pin Lin;Ing-Chou Lai
Vol. 11 , No. 7 , pp. 1163-1172
230 views DOI Abstract
2018
5-year follow-up of combined non-topography guided photorefractive keratectomy and corneal collagen cross linking for keratoconus
;Abdulrahman Mohammed Al-Amri
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 48-52
199 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,371 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

29.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.