The Classical Review | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8351 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

The Classical Review

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name The Classical Review
Abbreviated Name the classical review
ISSN 0
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (79 total)

2018
the optic nerve head perfusion and its correlation with the macular blood perfusion in unilateral idiopathic macular hole: an optical coherence tomography angiography study
;Xin-Xin Liu;Yu-Fei Teng;Meng Gao;Xi-Da Liang;Yan-Ping Yu;Wu Liu
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 438-444
560 views DOI Abstract
2013
comparison of visual acuity, refractive results and complications of femtosecond laser with mechanical microkeratome in lasik
;Murat Moray;Tansu Gonen;Cemile Banu Cosar;Asim Bozkurt Sener
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 350-355
522 views DOI Abstract
2014
association of apolipoprotein e-219t>g promoter polymorphism with primary open angle glaucoma in turkish population
;Emel Saglar;Banu Bozkurt;Murat Irkec
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 426-430
497 views DOI Abstract
2018
change in foveal position based on age and axial length in high myopic eyes
;Qian Zhang;Kaddie Kwok Chen;Wei-Feng Liu;Guo-Fu Huang
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 844-847
495 views DOI Abstract
2015
ocular biometry in the adult population in rural central china:a population-based, cross-sectional study
;Ting Fu;Yin-Wei Song;Zhi-Qi Chen;Jun-Wen He;Kun Qiao;Xu-Fang Sun;Hong Zhang;Jun-Ming Wang
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 812-817
445 views DOI Abstract
2013
a randomized controlled trial of omega-3 fatty acids in dry eye syndrome
;Rahul Bhargava;Prachi Kumar;Manjushrii Kumar;Namrata Mehra;Anurag Mishra
Vol. 6 , No. 6 , pp. 811-816
425 views DOI Abstract
2015
pterygium epithelium abnormal differentiation related to activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathway in vitro
;Juan Peng;Xiang-Yin Sha;Yi Liu;Rui-Ming Yang;Ye Wen
Vol. 8 , No. 6 , pp. 1118-1125
389 views DOI Abstract
2017
role of short-wavelength filtering lenses in delaying myopia progression and amelioration of asthenopia in juveniles
;Hai-Lan Zhao;Jin Jiang;Jie Yu;Hai-Ming Xu
Vol. 10 , No. 8 , pp. 1261-1267
388 views DOI Abstract
2012
pi3k/akt/mtor signaling pathway inhibitors in proliferation of retinal pigment epithelial cells
;Na Cai;Shun-Dong Dai;Ning-Ning Liu;Li-Min Liu;Ning Zhao;Lei Chen
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. 675-680
355 views DOI Abstract
2017
mathematical analysis of corneal remodelling after intracorneal ring surgery in keratoconus
;Elias F. Jarade;Elise Slim;Carole Cherfan;Hala El Rami;Toufic Hassan;Elias Chelala
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 348-354
348 views DOI Abstract
View All 79 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.