Indexed in Journament

Revista de saude publica

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,985 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
201 Articles
Scores higher than 55.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Rev Saude Publica
Abbreviated Name revista de saúde pública
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 59.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Revista de saude publica
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 9.3 7.8
Content Distribution 59.1 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (201)

root proteomic analysis of grapevine rootstocks inoculated with rhizophagus irregularis and fusarium oxysporum f. sp. herbemontis
Vol. 41 , pp. -
500 views DOI Abstract
1994
Utilização do teste de eritroimunoadsorção por captura no imunodiagnóstico da neurocisticercose Capture erytroimmunoadsorption test for neurocysticercosis immunodiagnosis
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 116-120
499 views Abstract
1987
Avaliação do anticoncepcional Norplant no Município do Rio de Janeiro, RJ (Brasil) An assessment of the use of the contraceptive Norplant in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Vol. 21 , No. 6 , pp. 513-522
435 views Abstract
characterization and classification of soils under forest and pasture in an agroextractivist project in eastern amazonia
Vol. 40 , pp. -
435 views DOI Abstract
2017
Teamwork: relevance and interdependence of interprofessional education.
Vol. 51 , pp. 39
424 views DOI Abstract
1975
0000
Risk factors for perinatal mortality in an urban area of Southern Brazil, 1993
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 209-216
416 views Abstract
2018
environmental correlation and spatial autocorrelation of soil properties in keller peninsula, maritime antarctica
Vol. 41 , pp. -
393 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development of an instrument to measure the cultural competence of health care workers.
Vol. 54 , pp. 29
380 views DOI Abstract
2020
Major depressive episode among university students in Southern Brazil.
Vol. 54 , pp. 11
36 views DOI Abstract
2020
Scoping review of studies on food marketing in Latin America: Summary of existing evidence and research gaps.
Vol. 53 , pp. 107
268 views DOI Abstract
2019
The development of transversal competence of health service managers.
Vol. 53 , pp. 74
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Qualitative evaluation of an intervention to reduce energy poverty.
Vol. 53 , pp. 62
367 views DOI Abstract
2018
environmental correlation and spatial autocorrelation of soil properties in keller peninsula, maritime antarctica
Vol. 41 , pp. -
393 views DOI Abstract
2018
Disseminating health evidence summaries to increase evidence use in health care.
Vol. 52 , pp. 57
354 views DOI Abstract
2017
Factors associated with self-reported discrimination against men who have sex with men in Brazil
Vol. 51 , pp. -
199 views Abstract
2017
Working hours associated with unintentional sleep at work among airline pilots.
Vol. 51 , pp. 61
339 views DOI Abstract
2017
Informality and employment vulnerability: application in sellers with subsistence work.
Vol. 51 , pp. 89
250 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,985 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.