Indexed in Journament

angewandte chemie (international ed in english)

ISSN 1521-3773· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #2,862 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
192 Articles
Scores higher than 90.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name angew chem int ed engl
Abbreviated Name angew chem int ed engl
ISSN 1521-3773
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15213773

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for angewandte chemie (international ed in english)
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 71.5 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 4.3 4.2
Content Distribution 51.7 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (192)

2015
the coetus internationalis patrum in the second vatican council: presentation and results of a survey
Vol. 13 , No. 38 , pp. 1051-1079
3,375 views Abstract
2019
Directed Evolution of a Bacterial Laccase (CueO) for Enzymatic Biofuel Cells.
Vol. 58 , No. 14 , pp. 4562-4565
650 views DOI Abstract
2020
Armoring the Enzymes with Metal-Organic Frameworks.
610 views DOI Abstract
2019
Generation of Nanoparticle, Atomic-Cluster, and Single-Atom Cobalt Catalysts from Zeolitic Imidazole Frameworks by Spatial Isolation and Their Use in Zinc-Air Batteries.
Vol. 58 , No. 16 , pp. 5359-5364
533 views DOI Abstract
2019
Discovery of a potent GLUT inhibitor using rapafucin 3D microarrays.
513 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correlating anticancer drug delivery with vascular permeability of nanocarriers: renal clearable vs. non-renal clearable ones.
503 views DOI Abstract
2012
Visible-light photoredox catalysis in flow
Vol. 51 , No. 17 , pp. -
502 views Abstract
2020
Planar Chiral Organoboranes with Thermoresponsive Emission and Circularly Polarized Luminescence: Integration of Pillar[5]arenes with Boron Chemistry.
Vol. 59 , No. 28 , pp. 11267-11272
212 views DOI Abstract
2020
Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation from CdTe Photoanodes Annealed with CdCl2.
341 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
Hydrogen-Bonding Catalyzed Ring-Closing C-O/C-O Metathesis of Aliphatic Ethers over Ionic Liquid under Metal-Free Conditions.
319 views DOI Abstract
2020
Divergent Chemistry Paths for 3D and 1D Metallo-Covalent Organic Frameworks.
236 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ketones as Molecular Co-catalysts for Boosting Exciton-Involved Photocatalytic Molecular Oxygen Activation.
231 views DOI Abstract
2020
The kalimantacin polyketide antibiotics inhibit fatty acid biosynthesis in Staphylococcus aureus by targeting the enoyl-acyl carrier protein binding site of FabI.
410 views DOI Abstract
2020
21st Century, More Twins in Scientific Literature: Intentional or Accidental?
219 views DOI Abstract
2020
Strong, Self-Healable, and Recyclable Visible-Light-Responsive Hydrogel Actuators.
311 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #2,862 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

71.5/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

51.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.