decyzje | Journament

Journal Ranking

#498 / 33,853
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 9 hours ago

decyzje

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name decyzje
Abbreviated Name decyzje
ISSN 1733-0092
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (86 total)

2012
a formação do leitor do ensino fundamental: as legendas cinematográficas
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 98-107
283 views Abstract
2015
a sexualidade como patrimônio pessoal e cultural: uma porta aberta por marabá de amoedo na perspectiva do museu como espaço educativo e intercultural
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 1007-1031
234 views Abstract
2011
DECISION-MAKING AND AGING
Vol. 8 , No. 15 , pp. 23-42
232 views Abstract
2010
algumas reflexões sobre educação sexual e estudos de gênero no trabalho de educadores do ciclo ii e ensino médio
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 152-161
218 views Abstract
2016
high skills/giftedness and visual impairment: twice special educational need
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 1979-1993
214 views DOI Abstract
2016
special education public policies and fenapae's under the gramscian perspective
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 151-164
211 views DOI Abstract
2015
cursos de licenciatura: a formação de professores para atuação na perspectiva da educação para a diversidade
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 719-740
198 views Abstract
2010
a organização do currículo integrado na prática pedagógica dos professores do 1º ciclo de formação
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 162-172
196 views Abstract
2018
profissão docente: elementos demarcadores das representações sociais de professores em início de carreira
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 1132-1148
187 views DOI Abstract
2016
the use of information technologies and communication assistive technology as applied in the construction of knowledge of students with visual disabilities who attend rooms multifunction resources
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 111-130
183 views DOI Abstract
36
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

35.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.