DECISION-MAKING AND AGING
Clicks: 298
ID: 2316
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
72.4
/100
298 views
206 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #4 of 86 articles by views in decyzje
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The paper presents and compares four nonprobabilistic procedures of fair division of a set of indivisible goods with money: Original Knaster, Adjusted Knaster, Equal Shares and Second Prices. The last two are presented for the first time in the article. The analysis concerns the formal properties of those methods, namely: strong Pareto optimality, proportionality, envy-freeness, fairness, strategy-proofness and anonymity. Moreover, classes of situations in which those procedures meet aforementioned properties will be compared.
| Reference Key |
sobkw2011decisionmakingdecyzje
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sobków, Agata ; |
| Journal | decyzje |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.