JMIR mHealth and uHealth | Journament

Journal Ranking

#260 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
Abbreviated Name jmir mhealth uhealth
ISSN 2291-5222
Aim and Scope
URL https://mhealth.jmir.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (91 total)

2014
A Low-Intensity Mobile Health Intervention With and Without Health Counseling for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes, Part 1: Baseline and Short-Term Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in the Norwegian Part of RENEWING HEALTH
Lis Ribu;
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. e52-
685 views DOI Abstract
2017
golden sine algorithm: a novel math-inspired algorithm
;TANYILDIZI, E.;DEMIR, G.
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 71-78
630 views DOI Abstract
2020
User Perceptions of Virtual Hospital Apps in China: Systematic Search
Jucheng Yang;
Vol. 8 , No. 8 , pp. e19487-
546 views DOI Abstract
2020
Smartphone Apps for the Treatment of Mental Disorders: Systematic Review.
Miralles, Ignacio;Granell, Carlos;Díaz-Sanahuja, Laura;Van Woensel, William;Bretón-López, Juana;Mira, Adriana;Castilla, Diana;Casteleyn, Sven;
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. e14897
440 views DOI Abstract
2018
design of an high frequency rfid multi-loop antenna for applications in metallic environments
;PETRARIU, A. I.;LAVRIC, A.;COCA, E.
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 35-40
426 views DOI Abstract
2020
Engaging Users in the Behavior Change Process With Digitalized Motivational Interviewing and Gamification: Development and Feasibility Testing of the Precious App.
Nurmi, Johanna;Knittle, Keegan;Ginchev, Todor;Khattak, Fida;Helf, Christopher;Zwickl, Patrick;Castellano-Tejedor, Carmina;Lusilla-Palacios, Pilar;Costa-Requena, Jose;Ravaja, Niklas;Haukkala, Ari;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. e12884
422 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mobile Health Features Supporting Self-Management Behavior in Patients With Chronic Arthritis: Mixed-Methods Approach on Patient Preferences.
Geuens, Jonas;Geurts, Luc;Swinnen, Thijs W;Westhovens, Rene;Vanden Abeele, Vero;
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. e12535
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of Electronic and Paper-Pen Data Capturing Tools for Data Quality in a Public Health Survey in a Health and Demographic Surveillance Site, Ethiopia: Randomized Controlled Crossover Health Care Information Technology Evaluation.
Zeleke, Atinkut Alamirrew;Worku, Abebaw Gebeyehu;Demissie, Adina;Otto-Sobotka, Fabian;Wilken, Marc;Lipprandt, Myriam;Tilahun, Binyam;Röhrig, Rainer;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. e10995
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Strategies for the Successful Implementation of a Novel iPhone Loaner System (iShare) in mHealth Interventions: Prospective Study.
Yang, William E;Spaulding, Erin M;Lumelsky, David;Hung, George;Huynh, Pauline Phuong;Knowles, Kellen;Marvel, Francoise A;Vilarino, Valerie;Wang, Jane;Shah, Lochan M;Xun, Helen;Shan, Rongzi;Wongvibulsin, Shannon;Martin, Seth S;
Vol. 7 , No. 12 , pp. e16391
397 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Mobile Health Wallet for Pregnancy-Related Health Care in Madagascar: Mixed-Methods Study on Opportunities and Challenges.
Muller, Nadine;Emmrich, Peter Martin Ferdinand;Rajemison, Elsa Niritiana;De Neve, Jan-Walter;Bärnighausen, Till;Knauss, Samuel;Emmrich, Julius Valentin;
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. e11420
388 views DOI Abstract
View All 91 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.