Indexed in Journament

Briefings in bioinformatics

ISSN 1477-4054· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,532 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
55 Articles
Scores higher than 64.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Brief Bioinform
Abbreviated Name brief bioinformatics
ISSN 1477-4054
URL http://bib.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 70.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 24.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Briefings in bioinformatics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 70.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 9.3 13.4
Content Distribution 24.2 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (55)

2019
PRISMOID: a comprehensive 3D structure database for post-translational modifications and mutations with functional impact.
466 views DOI Abstract
2019
Harmonizing semantic annotations for computational models in biology.
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 540-550
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
A novel molecular representation with BiGRU neural networks for learning atom.
390 views DOI Abstract
2009
A pitfall of wiki solution for biological databases
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. -
379 views Abstract
2019
Evaluation of single-cell classifiers for single-cell RNA sequencing data sets.
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
iLearn: an integrated platform and meta-learner for feature engineering, machine-learning analysis and modeling of DNA, RNA and protein sequence data.
361 views DOI Abstract
2020
Semantic similarity and machine learning with ontologies.
351 views DOI Abstract
2020
Deep learning-based clustering approaches for bioinformatics.
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comprehensive review and assessment of computational methods for predicting RNA post-transcriptional modification sites from RNA sequences.
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
DTI-CDF: a cascade deep forest model towards the prediction of drug-target interactions based on hybrid features.
344 views DOI Abstract
2026
scGenoByte: a GenoByte embedding transformer with biological priors for cell type annotation
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
2026
Exploring per-base quality scores as a surrogate marker of cell-free DNA fragmentome
17 views DOI Abstract
2026
FerroScore: a statistical approach for quantifying tumor-related ferroptosis based on omics data
21 views DOI Abstract
2026
Literature-informed gene extraction and ranking for multimodal data fusion
18 views DOI Abstract
2026
SA-MTP: a structure-aware framework for multifunctional therapeutic peptide annotation
19 views DOI Abstract
2023
Census of exposed aggregation-prone regions in proteomes.
Vol. 24
97 views DOI Abstract
2023
DMPPred: a tool for identification of antigenic regions responsible for inducing type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Vol. 24 , No. 1
104 views DOI Abstract
2023
Advances in the field of phage-based therapy with special emphasis on computational resources.
Vol. 24 , No. 1
116 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,532 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

24.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.