Briefings in bioinformatics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3125 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
65
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Briefings in bioinformatics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Brief Bioinform
Abbreviated Name brief bioinformatics
ISSN 1477-4054
Aim and Scope
URL http://bib.oxfordjournals.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (49 total)

2019
PRISMOID: a comprehensive 3D structure database for post-translational modifications and mutations with functional impact.
Li, Fuyi;Fan, Cunshuo;Marquez-Lago, Tatiana T;Leier, André;Revote, Jerico;Jia, Cangzhi;Zhu, Yan;Smith, A Ian;Webb, Geoffrey I;Liu, Quanzhong;Wei, Leyi;Li, Jian;Song, Jiangning;
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
Harmonizing semantic annotations for computational models in biology.
Neal, Maxwell Lewis;König, Matthias;Nickerson, David;Mısırlı, Göksel;Kalbasi, Reza;Dräger, Andreas;Atalag, Koray;Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi;Cooling, Michael T;Cook, Daniel L;Crook, Sharon;de Alba, Miguel;Friedman, Samuel H;Garny, Alan;Gennari, John H;Gleeson, Padraig;Golebiewski, Martin;Hucka, Michael;Juty, Nick;Myers, Chris;Olivier, Brett G;Sauro, Herbert M;Scharm, Martin;Snoep, Jacky L;Touré, Vasundra;Wipat, Anil;Wolkenhauer, Olaf;Waltemath, Dagmar;
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 540-550
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
A novel molecular representation with BiGRU neural networks for learning atom.
Lin, Xuan;Quan, Zhe;Wang, Zhi-Jie;Huang, Huang;Zeng, Xiangxiang;
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of single-cell classifiers for single-cell RNA sequencing data sets.
Zhao, Xinlei;Wu, Shuang;Fang, Nan;Sun, Xiao;Fan, Jue;
332 views DOI Abstract
2009
A pitfall of wiki solution for biological databases
Arita M;;
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. -
332 views Abstract
2020
Deep learning-based clustering approaches for bioinformatics.
Karim, Md Rezaul;Beyan, Oya;Zappa, Achille;Costa, Ivan G;Rebholz-Schuhmann, Dietrich;Cochez, Michael;Decker, Stefan;
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
iLearn: an integrated platform and meta-learner for feature engineering, machine-learning analysis and modeling of DNA, RNA and protein sequence data.
Chen, Zhen;Zhao, Pei;Li, Fuyi;Marquez-Lago, Tatiana T;Leier, André;Revote, Jerico;Zhu, Yan;Powell, David R;Akutsu, Tatsuya;Webb, Geoffrey I;Chou, Kuo-Chen;Smith, A Ian;Daly, Roger J;Li, Jian;Song, Jiangning;
309 views DOI Abstract
2020
Semantic similarity and machine learning with ontologies.
Kulmanov, Maxat;Smaili, Fatima Zohra;Gao, Xin;Hoehndorf, Robert;
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
DTI-CDF: a cascade deep forest model towards the prediction of drug-target interactions based on hybrid features.
Chu, Yanyi;Kaushik, Aman Chandra;Wang, Xiangeng;Wang, Wei;Zhang, Yufang;Shan, Xiaoqi;Salahub, Dennis Russell;Xiong, Yi;Wei, Dong-Qing;
301 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comprehensive review and assessment of computational methods for predicting RNA post-transcriptional modification sites from RNA sequences.
Chen, Zhen;Zhao, Pei;Li, Fuyi;Wang, Yanan;Smith, A Ian;Webb, Geoffrey I;Akutsu, Tatsuya;Baggag, Abdelkader;Bensmail, Halima;Song, Jiangning;
283 views DOI Abstract
View All 49 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
65
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

65.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.