Harmonizing semantic annotations for computational models in biology.
Clicks: 402
ID: 40528
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
71.1
/100
402 views
281 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2 of 58 articles by views in Briefings in bioinformatics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Life science researchers use computational models to articulate and test hypotheses about the behavior of biological systems. Semantic annotation is a critical component for enhancing the interoperability and reusability of such models as well as for the integration of the data needed for model parameterization and validation. Encoded as machine-readable links to knowledge resource terms, semantic annotations describe the computational or biological meaning of what models and data represent. These annotations help researchers find and repurpose models, accelerate model composition and enable knowledge integration across model repositories and experimental data stores. However, realizing the potential benefits of semantic annotation requires the development of model annotation standards that adhere to a community-based annotation protocol. Without such standards, tool developers must account for a variety of annotation formats and approaches, a situation that can become prohibitively cumbersome and which can defeat the purpose of linking model elements to controlled knowledge resource terms. Currently, no consensus protocol for semantic annotation exists among the larger biological modeling community. Here, we report on the landscape of current annotation practices among the COmputational Modeling in BIology NEtwork community and provide a set of recommendations for building a consensus approach to semantic annotation.
| Reference Key |
neal2019harmonizingbriefings
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Neal, Maxwell Lewis;König, Matthias;Nickerson, David;Mısırlı, Göksel;Kalbasi, Reza;Dräger, Andreas;Atalag, Koray;Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi;Cooling, Michael T;Cook, Daniel L;Crook, Sharon;de Alba, Miguel;Friedman, Samuel H;Garny, Alan;Gennari, John H;Gleeson, Padraig;Golebiewski, Martin;Hucka, Michael;Juty, Nick;Myers, Chris;Olivier, Brett G;Sauro, Herbert M;Scharm, Martin;Snoep, Jacky L;Touré, Vasundra;Wipat, Anil;Wolkenhauer, Olaf;Waltemath, Dagmar; |
| Journal | Briefings in bioinformatics |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1093/bib/bby087
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.