Harmonizing semantic annotations for computational models in biology.

Clicks: 402
ID: 40528
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #2 of 58 articles by views in Briefings in bioinformatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Life science researchers use computational models to articulate and test hypotheses about the behavior of biological systems. Semantic annotation is a critical component for enhancing the interoperability and reusability of such models as well as for the integration of the data needed for model parameterization and validation. Encoded as machine-readable links to knowledge resource terms, semantic annotations describe the computational or biological meaning of what models and data represent. These annotations help researchers find and repurpose models, accelerate model composition and enable knowledge integration across model repositories and experimental data stores. However, realizing the potential benefits of semantic annotation requires the development of model annotation standards that adhere to a community-based annotation protocol. Without such standards, tool developers must account for a variety of annotation formats and approaches, a situation that can become prohibitively cumbersome and which can defeat the purpose of linking model elements to controlled knowledge resource terms. Currently, no consensus protocol for semantic annotation exists among the larger biological modeling community. Here, we report on the landscape of current annotation practices among the COmputational Modeling in BIology NEtwork community and provide a set of recommendations for building a consensus approach to semantic annotation.
Reference Key
neal2019harmonizingbriefings Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Neal, Maxwell Lewis;König, Matthias;Nickerson, David;Mısırlı, Göksel;Kalbasi, Reza;Dräger, Andreas;Atalag, Koray;Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi;Cooling, Michael T;Cook, Daniel L;Crook, Sharon;de Alba, Miguel;Friedman, Samuel H;Garny, Alan;Gennari, John H;Gleeson, Padraig;Golebiewski, Martin;Hucka, Michael;Juty, Nick;Myers, Chris;Olivier, Brett G;Sauro, Herbert M;Scharm, Martin;Snoep, Jacky L;Touré, Vasundra;Wipat, Anil;Wolkenhauer, Olaf;Waltemath, Dagmar;
Journal Briefings in bioinformatics
Year 2019
DOI
10.1093/bib/bby087
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.