AxialTAD: an axial contrast architecture for TAD boundary prediction from Hi-C

Clicks: 2
ID: 338183
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #62 of 62 articles by views in Briefings in bioinformatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Topologically associating domains (TADs) are fundamental units of 3D chromatin organization, and accurate identification of TAD boundaries from Hi-C contact matrices remains an active challenge. Recent deep learning approaches have advanced substantially, but these rely on increasingly large architectures, raising the question of how much of this capacity boundary-centric analysis requires. Here we propose AxialTAD, a compact deep learning model centered on an Axial Contrast Module (ACM) that explicitly encodes directional contrast in contact intensity along the row and column axes of local Hi-C patches, an operator aligned with the geometric signature of TAD boundaries. Evaluated on four human cell lines (GM12878, HeLa-S3, IMR-90, K562) within cell lines and under leave-one-cell-out generalization, AxialTAD performed comparably with a recent convolutional neural network (CNN)+Transformer baseline (deepTAD) while using 76%-80% fewer trainable parameters (113K-137K versus 571K). A parameter-matched conventional CNN achieved similar F1 to AxialTAD in the human 25 kb experiments. When trained and evaluated within each of two mouse datasets, AxialTAD outperformed both this control and deepTAD. Orthogonal validation against CTCF and cohesin ChIP-seq supported the biological plausibility of the predicted boundaries. These results indicate that, within the range of architectures examined, a large architecture is not necessary to reach this level of boundary prediction.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225125145 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Briefings in bioinformatics
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bib/bbag603
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.