Indexed in Journament

sudebno-meditsinskaia ekspertiza

ISSN 0039-4521· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,607 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
644 Articles
Scores higher than 33.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

ชื่อย่อ sud med ekspert
ชื่อตัวย่อ sud med ekspert
ISSN 0039-4521
URL http://www.mediasphera.ru/journals/smekc

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for sudebno-meditsinskaia ekspertiza
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 10.0 13.4
Content Distribution 83.0 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (644)

2017
comparative gene expression analysis of lymphocytes treated with exosomes derived from ovarian cancer and ovarian cysts
Vol. 8 , pp. -
585 views DOI Abstract
2015
any condomless anal intercourse is no longer an accurate measure of hiv sexual risk behaviour in gay and other men who have sex with men
Vol. 6 , pp. -
516 views DOI Abstract
2014
frequency patterns of t-cell exposed motifs in immunoglobulin heavy chain peptides presented by mhcs
Vol. 5 , pp. -
449 views DOI Abstract
2014
multivariate analysis using high definition flow cytometry reveals distinct t cell repertoires between the foetal-maternal interface and the peripheral blood
Vol. 5 , pp. -
444 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Influence of negative ambient temperature on the morphology of blood droplet traces].
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 33-36
429 views DOI Abstract
2013
igm repertoire biodiversity is reduced in hiv-1 infection and systemic lupus erythematosus
Vol. 4 , pp. -
400 views DOI Abstract
2016
tissue-specific expression patterns of microrna during acute graft-versus-host disease in the rat.
Vol. 7 , pp. -
397 views DOI Abstract
2014
does type i interferon limit protective neutrophil responses during pulmonary francisella tularensis infection?
Vol. 5 , pp. -
397 views DOI
2020
2020
analysis of mrgprb2 receptor-evoked ca2+ signaling in bone marrow derived (bmmc) and peritoneal (pmc) mast cells of trpc-deficient mice
Vol. 11 , pp. -
228 views DOI Abstract
2020
altered monocyte and langerhans cell innate immunity in patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (rrp)
Vol. 11 , pp. -
237 views DOI Abstract
2020
the role of calcium–calcineurin–nfat signaling pathway in health and autoimmune diseases
Vol. 11 , pp. -
238 views DOI Abstract
2020
cord blood platelet rich plasma derivatives for clinical applications in non-transfusion medicine
Vol. 11 , pp. -
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
engineering cytoplasmic signaling of cd28ζ cars for improved therapeutic functions
Vol. 11 , pp. -
296 views DOI Abstract
2020
[Analysis of the publications of the journal «Forensic medical examination» on the problem of identification from 1980 to 2018].
Vol. 63 , No. 2 , pp. 58-63
281 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Influence of negative ambient temperature on the morphology of blood droplet traces].
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 33-36
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Influence of negative ambient temperature on the morphology of blood droplet traces].
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 33-36
429 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,607 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

83.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.