Indexed in Journament

advances in health sciences education : theory and practice

ISSN 1573-1677· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.0/100
Journament Score
#5,791
Journament Rank
14
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name adv health sci educ theory pract
Abbreviated Name adv health sci educ theory pract
ISSN 1573-1677

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2011
The effect of surgeon empathy and emotional intelligence on patient satisfaction
Weng HC;Steed JF;Yu SW;Liu YT;Hsu CC;Yu TJ;Chen W;;
Vol. 16 , No. 5 , pp. -
500 views Abstract
2019
"I didn't realise they had such a key role." Impact of medical education curriculum change on medical student interactions with nurses: a qualitative exploratory study of student perceptions.
Samuriwo, Ray;Laws, Elinor;Webb, Katie;Bullock, Alison;
437 views DOI Abstract
2019
Student dignity during work-integrated learning: a qualitative study exploring student and supervisors' perspectives.
Davis, Corinne;King, Olivia A;Clemans, Allie;Coles, Jan;Crampton, Paul E S;Jacobs, Nicky;McKeown, Tui;Morphet, Julia;Seear, Kate;Rees, Charlotte E;
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Conflict between clinician teachers and their students: the clinician perspective.
Michael Shanahan, Ernst;van der Vleuten, Cees;Schuwirth, Lambert;
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Disabled healthcare professionals' diverse, embodied, and socially embedded experiences.
Bulk, Laura Yvonne;Tikhonova, Julia;Gagnon, Jennifer M;Battalova, Alfiya;Mayer, Yael;Krupa, Terry;Lee, Michael;Nimmon, Laura;Jarus, Tal;
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
A review to identify key perspectives in PBL meta-analyses and reviews: trends, gaps and future research directions.
Hung, Woei;Dolmans, Diana H J M;van Merriënboer, Jeroen J G;
363 views DOI Abstract
2020
When logics of learning conflict: an analysis of two workplace-based continuing education programs.
Rowland, Paula;Boyd, Victoria;Lising, Dean;Goldman, Joanne;Whitehead, Cynthia;Ng, Stella L;
346 views DOI Abstract
2020
"Starting from a higher place": linking Habermas to teaching and learning clinical reasoning in the emergency medicine context.
Delany, Clare;Kameniar, Barbara;Lysk, Jayne;Vaughan, Brett;
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Problem-based projects in medical education: extending PBL practices and broadening learning perspectives.
Stentoft, Diana;
, pp. 0-0
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Debiasing versus knowledge retrieval checklists to reduce diagnostic error in ECG interpretation.
Sibbald, Matt;Sherbino, Jonathan;Ilgen, Jonathan S;Zwaan, Laura;Blissett, Sarah;Monteiro, Sandra;Norman, Geoffrey;
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. 427-440
337 views DOI Abstract
2020
"Starting from a higher place": linking Habermas to teaching and learning clinical reasoning in the emergency medicine context.
Delany, Clare;Kameniar, Barbara;Lysk, Jayne;Vaughan, Brett;
344 views DOI Abstract
2020
When logics of learning conflict: an analysis of two workplace-based continuing education programs.
Rowland, Paula;Boyd, Victoria;Lising, Dean;Goldman, Joanne;Whitehead, Cynthia;Ng, Stella L;
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Conflict between clinician teachers and their students: the clinician perspective.
Michael Shanahan, Ernst;van der Vleuten, Cees;Schuwirth, Lambert;
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Debiasing versus knowledge retrieval checklists to reduce diagnostic error in ECG interpretation.
Sibbald, Matt;Sherbino, Jonathan;Ilgen, Jonathan S;Zwaan, Laura;Blissett, Sarah;Monteiro, Sandra;Norman, Geoffrey;
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. 427-440
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessment in the context of problem-based learning.
van der Vleuten, Cees P M;Schuwirth, Lambert W T;
Vol. 24 , No. 5 , pp. 903-914
241 views DOI Abstract
2019
A review to identify key perspectives in PBL meta-analyses and reviews: trends, gaps and future research directions.
Hung, Woei;Dolmans, Diana H J M;van Merriënboer, Jeroen J G;
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Problem-based projects in medical education: extending PBL practices and broadening learning perspectives.
Stentoft, Diana;
, pp. 0-0
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
A thorny path: the developmental course of problem-based learning for health sciences education in Asia.
Kwan, Chiu-Yin;
, pp. 0-0
243 views DOI Abstract
2019
How theory and design-based research can mature PBL practice and research.
Dolmans, Diana H J M;
271 views DOI Abstract
2019
Disabled healthcare professionals' diverse, embodied, and socially embedded experiences.
Bulk, Laura Yvonne;Tikhonova, Julia;Gagnon, Jennifer M;Battalova, Alfiya;Mayer, Yael;Krupa, Terry;Lee, Michael;Nimmon, Laura;Jarus, Tal;
388 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
43
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

42.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.