Indexed in Journament

trendy ekonomiky a managementu

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,770 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
30 Articles
Scores higher than 8.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nome Abreviado trendy ekonomiky a managementu
Nome Abreviado trendy ekonomiky a managementu
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 24.0
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 56.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility — 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.4
Innovation 24.0 25.7
Community Impact 6.4 5.8
Content Distribution 56.8 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

2013
Application of Delay Differential Equations in the Model of the Relationship Between Unemployment and Inflation
Novotná, Veronika;
Vol. 6 , No. 10 , pp. 77-82
560 views Abstract
2018
heart failure and hypothermia in an infant: pseudocyanide syndrome?
;J. Scott Baird
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
531 views DOI Abstract
2018
Foreign Direct Investment Determinants among Polish Companies: Greenfield Investments vs. Acquisitions
Karaszewski, Włodzimierz Marian;
Vol. 12 , No. 31 , pp. 19-30
494 views Abstract
2014
Míra pocitu ohrožení zaměstnanců a faktor stresu v kontextu jejich pracovní výkonnosti na příkladu podniku ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Karviná a. s
Hečko, Štefan;Janečková, Petra;Malátek, Vojtěch;Řihák, Radim;
Vol. 7 , No. 16 , pp. 16-30
488 views Abstract
2013
The Dilemmas over Credit Policy Management in a Company
Gorczyńska, Maria;
Vol. 5 , No. 8 , pp. 97-106
423 views Abstract
2013
fatal overdose due to confusion of an transdermal fentanyl delivery system
;Ingo Voigt
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
412 views DOI Abstract
2016
meralgia paresthetica after prone positioning ventilation in the intensive care unit
;Christian Svendsen Juhl;Martin Ballegaard;Morten H. Bestle;Peer Tfelt-Hansen
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
403 views DOI Abstract
2015
recurrent febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in a chronic cocaine user: a case of levamisole induced complications
;Eduardo Martinez;Raza Alvi;Sindhaghatta Venkatram;Gilda Diaz-Fuentes
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
395 views DOI Abstract
2015
flucytosine pharmacokinetics in a critically ill patient receiving continuous renal replacement therapy
;Megan E. Kunka;Elizabeth A. Cady;Heejung C. Woo;Melissa L. Thompson Bastin
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
374 views DOI Abstract
2013
Důsledky mobility zaměstnanců
Vnoučková, Lucie;Čejka, Robin;
Vol. 7 , No. 15 , pp. 92-104
366 views Abstract
2018
icatibant for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema in intubated patients: case series and literature review
;Erin K. Yeung;Haritha Saikumar;Jose Castaneda-Nerio;Sandra G. Adams;Mark Wong
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
188 views DOI Abstract
2018
heart failure and hypothermia in an infant: pseudocyanide syndrome?
;J. Scott Baird
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
531 views DOI Abstract
2018
Foreign Direct Investment Determinants among Polish Companies: Greenfield Investments vs. Acquisitions
Karaszewski, Włodzimierz Marian;
Vol. 12 , No. 31 , pp. 19-30
494 views Abstract
2017
severe rhabdomyolysis due to presumed drug interactions between atorvastatin with amlodipine and ticagrelor
;Iouri Banakh;Kavi Haji;Ross Kung;Sachin Gupta;Ravindranath Tiruvoipati
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
261 views DOI Abstract
2017
a nearly lethal screw: an unusual cause of recurrent bradycardia and asystole episodes after fixation of the cervical spine
;Amit Frenkel;Yair Binyamin;Evgeni Brotfain;Leonid Koyfman;Aviel Roy-Shapira;Ilan Shelef;Moti Klein
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
193 views DOI Abstract
2017
primitive tumour of the pulmonary valve: discussion of the differential diagnosis
;A. Hannecart;D. Ndjekembo-Shango;F. Vallot;O. Simonet;M. De Kock
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
201 views DOI Abstract
2017
a pediatric case of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage secondary to poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis
;Alison Markland;Gregory Hansen;Anke Banks;Rajni Chibbar;Darryl Adamko
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
192 views DOI Abstract
2017
intensive care in a patient with toxic epidermal necrolysis
;J. Wallenborn;M. Fischer
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
174 views DOI Abstract
2017
thiamine deficiency leading to refractory lactic acidosis in a pediatric patient
;Alicia M. Teagarden;Brian D. Leland;Courtney M. Rowan;Riad Lutfi
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
212 views DOI Abstract
2017
disseminated necrotizing leukoencephalopathy complicating septic shock in an immunocompetent patient
;Pedro Gaspar-da-Costa;Sofia Reimão;Sandra Braz;João Meneses Santos;Rui M. M. Victorino
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
272 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
25.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,770 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

25.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

24.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

56.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.