Health Communication | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1633 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Health Communication

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name Health Communication
Abbreviated Name health commun
ISSN 1041-0236
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/hhth20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (79 total)

2020
Framing as a Concept for Health Communication: A Systematic Review.
Guenther, Lars;Gaertner, Maria;Zeitz, Jessica;
, pp. 1-9
488 views DOI Abstract
2019
Young Adults' (Mis)use of Prescription Opioid Drugs: An Exploratory Study.
Xu, Jie;Cao, Xiaoxia;
, pp. 1-8
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relationships between Media Exposure and Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on HIV/AIDS: A Cross Sectional Survey of Adolescent Islamiyya Girls in Nigeria.
Muhammad Hamid, Adamu;Tamam, Ezhar;Nizam Bin Osman, Mohd;
, pp. 1-11
421 views DOI Abstract
2019
Food Safety and Rural Parents in China: Investigating an Effective Path for Risk Communication.
Li, Jiajie;Ren, Yanan;Ma, Wanzhen;Yu, Tongtong;
, pp. 1-10
418 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Battle against Mental Health Stigma: Examining How Veterans with PTSD Communicatively Manage Stigma.
Roscoe, Rikki A;
, pp. 1-10
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Extending Communication Campaign from Health to Peacebuilding: A Locally Driven Communication Campaign Approach as Part of A Peacebuilding Initiative in Liberia.
Kuang, Kai;Connaughton, Stacey L;Linabary, Jasmine R;Krishna, Arunima;Vibber, Kelly S;Anaele, Agaptus;Yakova, Liliya;
, pp. 1-10
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
Individual Willingness to Share Personal Health Information with Secondary Information Users in South Korea.
Jung, Yoonhyuk;Choi, Hanbyul;Shim, Hyeongsop;
, pp. 1-8
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
"Our Job is that Whole Gray Zone in Between There": Investigating Genetic Counselors' Strategies for Managing and Communicating Uncertainty.
Zhong, Lingzi;Woo, Jihun;Steinhardt, Mary A;Vangelisti, Anita L;
, pp. 1-10
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
How Inter-Disciplinary Group Members Manage Communication Challenges When Providing Hospice Care: An Application of Problematic Integration Theory.
Chatterjee, Karishma;Kozar, Paul;
, pp. 1-12
354 views DOI Abstract
2018
A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Guilt on Health-Related Attitudes and Intentions.
Xu, Zhan;Guo, Hao;
Vol. 33 , No. 5 , pp. 519-525
345 views DOI Abstract
View All 79 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.