Indexed in Journament

international journal of online engineering (ijoe)

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
24.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,037 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
43 Articles
Scores higher than 4.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name international journal of online engineering (ijoe)
Abbreviated Name international journal of online engineering (ijoe)
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 19.5
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 55.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for international journal of online engineering (ijoe)
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 19.5 31.2
Community Impact 5.7 13.4
Content Distribution 55.7 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (43)

2012
Holistic Web-based Virtual Micro Controller Framework for Research and Education
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 58-64
410 views Abstract
2012
The Role of Telematic Practices in Computer Engineering: A Low-cost Remote Power Control in a Network Lab
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 15-22
410 views Abstract
2013
Extending access to remote labs from mobile devices in educational contexts
Vol. 9 , No. S3 , pp. 9-13
399 views Abstract
2009
Collaborative Virtual 3D Environment for Internet-Accessible Physics Experiments
Vol. 5 , No. SI1: REV2009 , pp. 65-71
348 views Abstract
2010
the contents variations of the carotenoid pigments and total lipids in seabuckthorn false fruit and fruit
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. -
345 views Abstract
2007
Book Review "Advances on remote laboratories and e-learning experiences"
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. -
322 views Abstract
2006
biochemical effects induced by uv treatment on 5 romanian phaseolus vulgaris l. cultivars, grown in field
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. -
308 views Abstract
2007
the cytogenetic effects of the caffeine treatment on helianthus annuus l., favorit and pr64 a83 varieties
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. -
295 views Abstract
2010
study concerning the mathematical simulation and the interpretation of quality indicators of suceava river
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. -
280 views Abstract
2016
incidence of fluoroquinolone resistance in pseudomonas aeruginosa from urinary tract infections
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 59-64
171 views Abstract
2015
the impact of cofeo 4 nanoparticles on soluble protein content at white rot fungus phanerochaete chrysosporium
Vol. 16 , No. 4 , pp. 161-165
150 views Abstract
2015
the comparison of acid ascorbic content during processing of some vegetables and fruits
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 89-94
73 views Abstract
2014
cell proliferation and migration assay on polymer surfaces
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 35-39
106 views Abstract
2014
cervical cancer evolution by therapeutic conduct
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 27-37
24 views Abstract
2014
complications of prematurity as risk factors for outcome
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 41-48
105 views Abstract
2013
three synchronous primary pelvic cancers – a case report –
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. 55-59
23 views Abstract
2013
Extending access to remote labs from mobile devices in educational contexts
Vol. 9 , No. S3 , pp. 9-13
399 views Abstract
2012
immunohistochemical assessment of p16 protein and of l1 capsid protein of human papilloma virus in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 19-26
189 views Abstract
Journament Score
24.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,037 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

24.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

19.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

55.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.