Studies in health technology and informatics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1224 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

Studies in health technology and informatics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name Stud Health Technol Inform
Abbreviated Name stud health technol inform
ISSN 0926-9630
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.iospress.nl/bookserie/studies-in-health-technology-and-informatics
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (170 total)

2019
Digital Literacy Program for the Use of Social Media, Aimed at Health Professionals.
Alonso Galbán, P;Vialart Vidal, N;
Vol. 264 , pp. 1895-1896
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring the Discrepancies in Actual and Perceived Benefits of Dietary Supplements Among Obese Patients.
He, Zhe;Barrett, Laura A;Rizvi, Rubina;Payrovnaziri, Seyedeh Neelufar;Zhang, Rui;
Vol. 264 , pp. 1474-1475
407 views DOI Abstract
2019
Status Analysis of Nursing Assessment Terminology of Neurological Conditions and Its Cross-Mapping with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).
Ding, Shan-Ni;Pan, Hong-Ying;Yu, Xue-Qin;Zhang, Jian-Guo;
Vol. 264 , pp. 1876-1877
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improving Mechanical Ventilator Clinical Decision Support Systems with a Machine Learning Classifier for Determining Ventilator Mode.
Rehm, Gregory B;Kuhn, Brooks T;Nguyen, Jimmy;Anderson, Nicholas R;Chuah, Chen-Nee;Adams, Jason Y;
Vol. 264 , pp. 318-322
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient Health Information Technology Designed for Shared Decision Making: If We Implement It, Will It Become Normal Clinical Practice?
Davis, Selena;
Vol. 264 , pp. 1654-1655
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Examining Reproducibility of Literature Search in Meta-Analysis.
Li, Fan;Yang, Pei-Yin;Kang, Hong;Chen, Xiaoqiu;Shang, Chao;Gong, Yang;
Vol. 264 , pp. 228-232
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Design and Pilot Testing of an English and Spanish Behavioral Health Patient Survey on Data Privacy.
Aliste, Marcela P;Grando, Adela;Murcko, Anita;Soni, Hiral;Todd, Michael;Mukundan, Madhumita;Saks, Michael;Horrow, Caroline;Sharp, Richard;Dye, Christy;Chern, Darwyn;Whitfield, Mary Jo;Callesen, Mark;
Vol. 264 , pp. 1891-1892
363 views DOI Abstract
2018
Patient accessible electronic health records: Impacts on nursing documentation practices at a university hospital
Smaradottir, B.
Vol. 250 , pp. 14-18
361 views DOI
2019
Development of ICT-Based Comprehensive Health and Social-Needs Assessment System to Enhance Person-Centered Community Care.
Choi, Eun Jeong;Lim, Eunjung;Kwak, Minjung;Jeong, Miri;Lee, Nayoung;Kwon, Il Bum;Lee, Wonpyo;Ku, Hanwool;Kim, Dongil;Nam, Haesung;Na, Junsik;Park, Myonghwa;
Vol. 264 , pp. 1694-1695
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Privacy-Preserving Infrastructure for Analyzing Personal Health Data in a Vertically Partitioned Scenario.
Sun, Chang;Ippel, Lianne;van Soest, Johan;Wouters, Birgit;Malic, Alexander;Adekunle, Onaopepo;van den Berg, Bob;Mussmann, Ole;Koster, Annemarie;van der Kallen, Carla;van Oppen, Claudia;Townend, David;Dekker, Andre;Dumontier, Michel;
Vol. 264 , pp. 373-377
356 views DOI Abstract
View All 170 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.