Indexed in Journament

Studies in health technology and informatics

ISSN 0926-9630· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.0/100
Journament Score
#3,546
Journament Rank
170
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Stud Health Technol Inform
Abbreviated Name stud health technol inform
ISSN 0926-9630
URL https://www.iospress.nl/bookserie/studies-in-health-technology-and-informatics

Indexings

scopus ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (170)

2019
Digital Literacy Program for the Use of Social Media, Aimed at Health Professionals.
Alonso Galbán, P;Vialart Vidal, N;
Vol. 264 , pp. 1895-1896
434 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring the Discrepancies in Actual and Perceived Benefits of Dietary Supplements Among Obese Patients.
He, Zhe;Barrett, Laura A;Rizvi, Rubina;Payrovnaziri, Seyedeh Neelufar;Zhang, Rui;
Vol. 264 , pp. 1474-1475
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
Status Analysis of Nursing Assessment Terminology of Neurological Conditions and Its Cross-Mapping with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).
Ding, Shan-Ni;Pan, Hong-Ying;Yu, Xue-Qin;Zhang, Jian-Guo;
Vol. 264 , pp. 1876-1877
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improving Mechanical Ventilator Clinical Decision Support Systems with a Machine Learning Classifier for Determining Ventilator Mode.
Rehm, Gregory B;Kuhn, Brooks T;Nguyen, Jimmy;Anderson, Nicholas R;Chuah, Chen-Nee;Adams, Jason Y;
Vol. 264 , pp. 318-322
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient Health Information Technology Designed for Shared Decision Making: If We Implement It, Will It Become Normal Clinical Practice?
Davis, Selena;
Vol. 264 , pp. 1654-1655
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Examining Reproducibility of Literature Search in Meta-Analysis.
Li, Fan;Yang, Pei-Yin;Kang, Hong;Chen, Xiaoqiu;Shang, Chao;Gong, Yang;
Vol. 264 , pp. 228-232
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Design and Pilot Testing of an English and Spanish Behavioral Health Patient Survey on Data Privacy.
Aliste, Marcela P;Grando, Adela;Murcko, Anita;Soni, Hiral;Todd, Michael;Mukundan, Madhumita;Saks, Michael;Horrow, Caroline;Sharp, Richard;Dye, Christy;Chern, Darwyn;Whitfield, Mary Jo;Callesen, Mark;
Vol. 264 , pp. 1891-1892
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of ICT-Based Comprehensive Health and Social-Needs Assessment System to Enhance Person-Centered Community Care.
Choi, Eun Jeong;Lim, Eunjung;Kwak, Minjung;Jeong, Miri;Lee, Nayoung;Kwon, Il Bum;Lee, Wonpyo;Ku, Hanwool;Kim, Dongil;Nam, Haesung;Na, Junsik;Park, Myonghwa;
Vol. 264 , pp. 1694-1695
373 views DOI Abstract
2018
Patient accessible electronic health records: Impacts on nursing documentation practices at a university hospital
Smaradottir, B.
Vol. 250 , pp. 14-18
372 views DOI
2019
A Privacy-Preserving Infrastructure for Analyzing Personal Health Data in a Vertically Partitioned Scenario.
Sun, Chang;Ippel, Lianne;van Soest, Johan;Wouters, Birgit;Malic, Alexander;Adekunle, Onaopepo;van den Berg, Bob;Mussmann, Ole;Koster, Annemarie;van der Kallen, Carla;van Oppen, Claudia;Townend, David;Dekker, Andre;Dumontier, Michel;
Vol. 264 , pp. 373-377
368 views DOI Abstract
2025
Exploring the User Experience of Generative AI in Digital Health: A Rapid Review.
van den Berg, Liesbeth; Engelsma, Thomas; Dusseljee-Peute, Linda
Vol. 326 , pp. 12-16
65 views DOI Abstract
2025
User-Centered Methods in Explainable AI Development for Hospital Clinical Decision Support: A Scoping Review.
Van Dort, Bethany A; Engelsma, Thomas; Medlock, Stephanie; Dusseljee-Peute, Linda
Vol. 326 , pp. 17-21
67 views DOI Abstract
2024
Values Against Values. A Study of an Encounter Between Cultural Heritage Values and Values of Accessibility.
Sørmoen, Oddbjørn
Vol. 320 , pp. 371-378
57 views DOI Abstract
2022
Toward an Inclusive and Independent Fruition of Architecture: The Use of Scale Models and Augmented Reality.
Cavalieri, Federico;Rotilio, Marianna;De Berardinis, Pierluigi;
Vol. 297 , pp. 383-390
95 views DOI Abstract
2022
Web Quality Assurance of Information in Healthcare
Tsirintani, M.
Vol. 295 , pp. 442-445
77 views DOI Abstract
2022
Digital Medical Interview Assistant for Radiology: Opportunities and Challenges.
Denecke, Kerstin;Lombardi, Paolo;Nairz, Knud;
Vol. 293 , pp. 39-46
148 views DOI Abstract
2020
Accessibility and web quality information for people with disabilities in healthcare structures
Panagiotopoulou, M.
Vol. 272 , pp. 306-309
51 views DOI Abstract
2020
Document Oriented Graphical Analysis and Prediction.
Syed, Shorabuddin;Syed, Mahanazuddin;Syeda, Hafsa Bareen;Prior, Fred;Zozus, Meredith;Penning, Melody L;Orloff, Mohammed;
Vol. 270 , pp. 183-187
218 views DOI Abstract
2020
Towards Intelligent Integration and Sharing of Stem Cell Research Data.
Borziak, Kirill;Qi, Tianye;Evangelista, John Erol;Clarke, Daniel J B;Ma'ayan, Avi;Finkelstein, Joseph;
Vol. 272 , pp. 334-337
238 views DOI Abstract
2020
To Advance Population Health, We Need to Be "Well Behaved": The Science of Health Behaviour Change.
Rosenkranz, Richard R;
Vol. 268 , pp. 1-13
283 views DOI Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.