Indexed in Journament

food and chemical toxicology

ISSN 0278-6915· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,832 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
33 Articles
Scores higher than 18.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name food and chemical toxicology
Abbreviated Name food and chemical toxicology
ISSN 0278-6915
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/food-and-chemical-toxicology

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 11.1 22.7
Innovation 54.0 24.1
Community Impact 2.1 4.2
Content Distribution 71.8 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (33)

2010
In vitro antioxidant capacities and fatty acid compositions of three Centaurea species collected from Central Anatolia region of Turkey
Zengin, Gokhan;Cakmak, Yavuz Selim;Guler, Gokalp Ozmen;Aktumsek, Abdurrahman
Vol. 48 , No. 10 , pp. 2638-2641
387 views
2020
‘All chemical substances are harmful.’ public appraisal of uncertain risks of food additives and contaminants
Jansen, T.
Vol. 136 , pp. 0-0
383 views DOI
2013
Antioxidant potentials and anticholinesterase activities of methanolic and aqueous extracts of three endemic Centaurea L. species
Aktumsek, Abdurrahman;Zengin, Gokhan;Guler, Gokalp Ozmen;Cakmak, Yavuz Selim;Duran, Ahmet
Vol. 55 , pp. 290-296
342 views DOI
2011
Screening for in vitro antioxidant properties and fatty acid profiles of five Centaurea L. species from Turkey flora
Aktumsek A.
Vol. 49 , pp. 2914-2920
330 views DOI
2019
Exploration of the binding between ellagic acid, a potentially risky food additive, and bovine serum albumin
Liu, F.
Vol. 134 , pp. 0-0
296 views DOI
2016
social conflicts between oil-palm plantation company and indigenous people in jambi province
;Dewi Nilakrisna;Ridha Taqwa;Sriati Sriati;Dadang Hikmah Purnama;Robiyanto Hendro Susanto
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 113-117
292 views DOI Abstract
2012
pseudomonas fluorescens and pseudomonas putida for promoting growth of jatropha curcas seedling root
;Sri Sumarsih;Darban Haryanto
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 53-57
284 views Abstract
2013
Antioxidant potentials and anticholinesterase activities of methanolic and aqueous extracts of three endemic Centaurea L. species
Aktumsek A.
Vol. 55 , pp. 290-296
269 views DOI
2017
cysteine, malondyaldehide (mda) and glutathione (gsh) levels in marasmic type malnutrition
;Dwi Indah Cahyani;Anik Puryatni;Nur Permatasari
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 151-157
261 views DOI Abstract
2016
p53/surviving ratio as a parameter for chemotherapy induction response in children with acute myeloid leukemia
;Rinaldi Lenggana;Susanto Nugroho;Sri Winarsih
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 142-150
256 views DOI Abstract
2020
‘All chemical substances are harmful.’ public appraisal of uncertain risks of food additives and contaminants
Jansen, T.
Vol. 136 , pp. 0-0
383 views DOI
2019
Role of TFEB in autophagic modulation of ischemia reperfusion injury in mice kidney and protection by urolithin A
Wang, Y.
Vol. 131 , pp. 0-0
254 views DOI
2019
Exploration of the binding between ellagic acid, a potentially risky food additive, and bovine serum albumin
Liu, F.
Vol. 134 , pp. 0-0
296 views DOI
2019
An update on the mechanisms related to cell death and toxicity of doxorubicin and the protective role of nutrients
Varela-López, A.
Vol. 134 , pp. 0-0
199 views DOI
2019
Multiple pharmacological and toxicological investigations on Tanacetum parthenium and Salix alba extracts: Focus on potential application as anti-migraine agents
di, Giacomo V.
Vol. 133 , pp. 0-0
202 views DOI
2019
Multidirectional biological investigation and phytochemical profile of Rubus sanctus and Rubus ibericus
Zengin, G.
Vol. 127 , pp. 237-250
203 views DOI
2018
the role of coenzymes on mercury (hg2+) bioremediation by isolates pseudomonas aeruginosa khy2 and klebsiella pneumonia khy3
;Liswara Neneng;Yohanes Edy Gunawan
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 16-20
30 views DOI Abstract
2018
ethnobotany of mandailingtribe in batang gadis national park
;Aswarina Nasution;Tatik Chikmawati;Eko Baroto Walujo;Ervizal Amir Muhammad Zuhud
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 48-54
113 views DOI Abstract
2018
toxicity test on wedusan (ageratum spp.) extract against sitophilus spp. (coleoptera: curculionidae)
;Erinus Mosip;Bambang Rahardjo;Ludji Astuti
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 11-15
133 views Abstract
2018
tetracera scandens as a medicinal plant: secretory structures, histochemistry, and antibacterial activity
;Evi Muliyah;Sulistijorini Sulistijorini;Yohana Cecilia Sulistyaningsih;Mohamad Rafi
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 68-74
178 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,832 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

28.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

54.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.