science and technology of advanced materials | Journament

Journal Ranking

#50 / 33,810
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
100
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 19 hours ago

science and technology of advanced materials

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name
Abbreviated Name sci technol adv mater
ISSN 1468-6996
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (631 total)

2019
Heterogeneous structural changes correlated to local atomic order in thermal rejuvenation process of Cu-Zr metallic glass.
Wakeda, Masato;Saida, Junji;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 632-642
385 views DOI Abstract
2014
Nanoalloying and phase transformations during thermal treatment of physical mixtures of Pd and Cu nanoparticles
Mukundan, Vineetha;al., et;
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 025002-
384 views Abstract
2019
Heterogeneous structural changes correlated to local atomic order in thermal rejuvenation process of Cu-Zr metallic glass.
Wakeda, Masato;Saida, Junji;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 632-642
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Vitamin D-conjugated gold nanoparticles as functional carriers to enhancing osteogenic differentiation
Nah, H.
Vol. 20 , pp. 826-836
330 views DOI
2017
Synthesis of core-shell structured FAU/SBA-15 composite molecular sieves and their performance in catalytic cracking of polystyrene.
Du, Jinlong;Shi, Chunwei;Wu, Wenyuan;Bian, Xue;Chen, Ping;Cui, Qingzhu;Cui, Zhixuan;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 939-949
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stress dependence of indentation modulus for carbon fiber in polymer composite
Wang, H.
Vol. 20 , pp. 412-420
314 views DOI
2019
Alkyl-capped copper oxide nanospheres and nanoprolates for sustainability: water treatment and improved lubricating performance.
Chimeno-Trinchet, Christian;Fernández-González, Alfonso;García Calzón, Josefa Ángela;Díaz-García, Marta Elena;Badía Laíño, Rosana;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 657-672
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Spectrum adapted the expectation-maximization algorithm for high-throughput peak shift analysis.
Matsumura, Tarojiro;Nagamura, Naoka;Akaho, Shotaro;Nagata, Kenji;Ando, Yasunobu;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 733-745
291 views DOI Abstract
2013
advances in lie groups and applications in applied sciences
;Teoman Özer;Alexei F. Cheviakov;Shi Weichen;Nail Migranov;T. Raja Sekhar;Emrullah Yaşar
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
279 views DOI
2019
Modulation of surface physics and chemistry in triboelectric energy harvesting technologies
Lee, B.
Vol. 20 , pp. 758-773
264 views DOI
View All 631 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
37
100
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.