Indexed in Journament

jurnal teknologi dan industri pangan

ISSN 1979-7788· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,779 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
106 Articles
Scores higher than 80.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name jurnal teknologi dan industri pangan
Abbreviated Name jurnal teknologi dan industri pangan
ISSN 1979-7788
URL http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jtip

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Accessibility 35.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 66.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for jurnal teknologi dan industri pangan
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility 35.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 9.3 5.8
Content Distribution 66.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (106)

2017
jürgen habermas: délibération et démocratie [jürgen habermas: deliberation and democracy]
Vol. 24 , No. 44 , pp. 43-60
541 views DOI Abstract
2018
OPTIMASI PROSES PEMBUATAN TEPUNG LABU KUNING MENGGUNAKAN RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN AKTIVITAS ANTIOKSIDANNYA
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 29-38
433 views Abstract
2015
on a supposed incoherence between kant’s view on homosexuality and his view on autonomy
Vol. 20 , No. 33 , pp. 137-159
394 views Abstract
2010
heidegger e freud: clareira e cegueira?
Vol. 10 , No. 13-14 , pp. 09-21
327 views Abstract
2018
OPTIMASI PROSES PEMBUATAN TEPUNG LABU KUNING MENGGUNAKAN RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN AKTIVITAS ANTIOKSIDANNYA
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 29-38
433 views Abstract
2017
nicomachean ethics vi.9: good deliberation and phronesis [Ética a nicômaco vi.9: boa deliberação e phronesis]
Vol. 24 , No. 44 , pp. 9-41
206 views DOI Abstract
2017
jürgen habermas: délibération et démocratie [jürgen habermas: deliberation and democracy]
Vol. 24 , No. 44 , pp. 43-60
541 views DOI Abstract
2017
afinal de contas, o que é teoria crítica? [after all, what is critical theory?]
Vol. 24 , No. 44 , pp. 97-127
181 views DOI Abstract
2016
o desenvolvimento da filosofia da linguagem wittgensteiniana de 1929 a 1932
Vol. 22 , No. 39 , pp. 211-241
202 views Abstract
2016
2016
educação e moralidade em schopenhauer [schopenhauer on education and morality]
Vol. 23 , No. 40 , pp. 261-286
218 views Abstract
Journament Score
36.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,779 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.