alexandre de afrodísia pensa aristóteles: o caso do intelecto produtivo [alexander of aphrodisias thinks aristotle: the case of the productive intellect]

Clicks: 179
ID: 173400
2018
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #54 of 106 articles by views in jurnal teknologi dan industri pangan

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
O título de “comentador” dado a Alexandre de Afrodísia (c. 200 d.C.) por filósofos posteriores revela seu importante papel na elucidação do pensamento de Aristóteles. Esse título, porém, oculta o fato de que, na tentativa de completar as insuficiências e problemas emergentes do texto aristotélico, Alexandre desenvolveu ele mesmo, com argumentos próprios, uma doutrina filosófica consistente que em alguns aspectos não encontra qualquer ressonância direta no primeiro mestre e que também levanta novas questões. Neste artigo, pretendo mostrar como isso é o caso na noética tomando em perspectiva a noção de intelecto produtivo (noûs poiêtikós), ela mesma inexistente no Estagirita.   [The title of “commentator” ascribed to Alexander of Aphrodisias (c. 200 AD) by posterior philosophers reveals his important contribution to the elucidation of Aristotle’s thought. This title, however, conceals the fact that, in the attempt to fulfill the insufficiencies and emergent problems of the Aristotelian text, Alexander himself developed by proper arguments a consistent philosophical doctrine, which in some aspects does not have any resonance in the first master and that also arises new issues. In this article, I aim to show how this is the case in noetics, availing the notion of productive intellect (noûs poiêtikós), itself absent in Aristotle.]
Reference Key
neves2018princpiosalexandre Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Allan Neves
Journal jurnal teknologi dan industri pangan
Year 2018
DOI
10.21680/1983-2109.2018v25n46ID10343
URL
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/10343
Keywords
theory of knowledgemetaphysicsphilosophy (general)

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.