Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#66 / 33,718
πŸ“Š Below Average
Overall Score
48.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
85
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 months ago

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • βœ… Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • βœ… Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • βœ… No iframe limitations
  • βœ… Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • βœ… Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • βœ… Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Small
Abbreviated Name small
ISSN 1613-6829
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (95 total)

2019
Highly Efficient Electroreduction of CO on Nickel Single-Atom Catalysts: Atom Trapping and Nitrogen Anchoring.
Vol. 15 , No. 49 , pp. e1903668
537 views DOI Abstract
2019
K Ti O @C Microspheres with Enhanced K Intercalation Pseudocapacitance Ensuring Fast Potassium Storage and Long-Term Cycling Stability.
, pp. e1906131
525 views DOI Abstract
2018
Efficient Self-Driven Photodetectors Featuring a Mixed-Dimensional van der Waals Heterojunction Formed from a CdS Nanowire and a MoTe Flake.
Vol. 14 , No. 40 , pp. e1802302
477 views DOI Abstract
2019
Collaborative Design of Hollow Nanocubes, In Situ Cross-Linked Binder, and Amorphous Void@SiO @C as a Three-Pronged Strategy for Ultrastable Lithium Storage.
, pp. e1905736
472 views DOI Abstract
2019
Silica-Mediated Formation of Nickel Sulfide Nanosheets on CNT Films for Versatile Energy Storage.
Vol. 15 , No. 15 , pp. e1805064
465 views DOI Abstract
2019
One-Pot Exfoliation of Graphitic C N Quantum Dots for Blue QLEDs by Methylamine Intercalation.
Vol. 15 , No. 44 , pp. e1902735
465 views DOI Abstract
2016
Self-Powered UV-Near Infrared Photodetector Based on Reduced Graphene Oxide/n-Si Vertical Heterojunction.
Vol. 12 , No. 36 , pp. 5019-5026
459 views DOI Abstract
2019
Advances in Biological Liquid Crystals.
Vol. 15 , No. 18 , pp. e1900019
443 views DOI Abstract
2020
Non-3d Metal Modulation of a 2D Ni-Co Heterostructure Array as Multifunctional Electrocatalyst for Portable Overall Water Splitting.
, pp. e1906775
419 views DOI Abstract
2017
Porous Cobalt Phosphide Polyhedrons with Iron Doping as an Efficient Bifunctional Electrocatalyst.
Vol. 13 , No. 40
414 views DOI Abstract
49
Overall
Below Average
85
15
30
40
55
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

48.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

85.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.