Indexed in Journament

Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease

ISSN 1879-0070· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,197 of 33,995 indexed journals
48 Articles
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
Abbreviated Name diagn microbiol infect dis
ISSN 1879-0070
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/diagnostic-microbiology-and-infectious-disease

Publications Per Year

Articles (48)

2003
Use of the NOW Streptococcus pneumoniae urinary antigen test in cerebrospinal fluid for rapid diagnosis of pneumococcal meningitis
Vol. 45 , No. 4 , pp. -
505 views Abstract
1970
Comparative in vitro activity of gemifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and ofloxacin in a North American surveillance study
Vol. 40 , No. 1-2 , pp. -
434 views Abstract
2000
Intra and inter technologist variability in the quality assessment of respiratory tract specimens
Vol. 37 , No. 4 , pp. -
408 views Abstract
2018
Simultaneous quantification of systemic azoles and their major metabolites in human serum by HPLC/PDA: role of azole metabolic rate.
Vol. 92 , No. 1 , pp. 78-83
407 views DOI Abstract
2006
Assessment of a rapid urinary antigen detection by an immunochromatographic test for diagnosis of pneumococcal infection in children
Vol. 55 , No. 2 , pp. -
384 views Abstract
2002
Epidemiology and outcome of Clostridium difficile infection and diarrhea in HIV infected inpatients
Vol. 44 , No. 4 , pp. -
379 views Abstract
2015
In vitro activity of a Hos2 deacetylase inhibitor, MGCD290, in combination with echinocandins against echinocandin-resistant Candida species.
Vol. 81 , No. 4 , pp. 259-63
375 views DOI Abstract
2025
Oral fluid versus blood in HIV self-testing: A step towards "95-95-95" targets of the UNAIDS?
Vol. 113 , pp. 116867
96 views DOI Abstract
2023
In vitro susceptibility patterns for rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria in the United States.
Vol. 105 , No. 3 , pp. 115882
122 views DOI Abstract
2021
Impact of RNA degradation on influenza diagnosis in the surveillance system
Vol. 100 , No. 4 , pp. -
139 views Abstract
2020
Comparative in vitro activity of plazomicin and older aminoglyosides against Enterobacterales isolates; prevalence of aminoglycoside modifying enzymes and 16S rRNA methyltransferases.
Vol. 97 , No. 4 , pp. 115092
318 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nephrotoxicity prevalence in patients treated with polymyxins: a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies.
Vol. 94 , No. 1 , pp. 41-49
252 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparative in vitro pharmacodynamic analysis of isavuconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole against clinical isolates of aspergillosis, mucormycosis, fusariosis, and phaeohyphomycosis.
, pp. 114861
253 views DOI Abstract
2018
Simultaneous quantification of systemic azoles and their major metabolites in human serum by HPLC/PDA: role of azole metabolic rate.
Vol. 92 , No. 1 , pp. 78-83
407 views DOI Abstract
2017
design of animated subject materials in integral calculus course
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 294-298
167 views DOI Abstract
2017
analisis kemampuan koneksi matematika siswa kelas viii pada model eliciting activities (mea) ditinjau dari gaya kognitif
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 217-226
92 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,197 of 33,995
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.