oncology letters | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1250 / 33,954
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

oncology letters

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name oncol lett
Abbreviated Name oncol lett
ISSN 1792-1074
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.spandidos-publications.com/ol
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (39 total)

2019
Prognostic profile of patients with non-viral hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative study with hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma using data mining analysis.
Noda, Yu;Kawaguchi, Takumi;Kuromatsu, Ryoko;Komukai, Sho;Nakano, Masahito;Niizeki, Takashi;Koga, Hironori;Kawaguchi, Atsushi;Torimura, Takuji;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 227-236
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Differentially expressed genes and are potential prognostic biomarkers for gastric cancer.
Jiang, Kaiyuan;Liu, Hongmei;Xie, Dongyi;Xiao, Qiang;
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 3191-3202
367 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dysregulation of DNA methylation patterns may identify patients with breast cancer resistant to endocrine therapy: A predictive classifier based on differentially methylated regions.
Zhang, Fan;Cui, Yukun;
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 1287-1303
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identification of key genes and evaluation of clinical outcomes in lung squamous cell carcinoma using integrated bioinformatics analysis.
Shi, Yangfeng;Li, Yeping;Yan, Chao;Su, Hua;Ying, Kejing;
Vol. 18 , No. 6 , pp. 5859-5870
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Transcriptomic model-based lncRNAs and mRNAs serve as independent prognostic indicators in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Zhang, Zhi-Li;Zhao, Li-Jing;Xu, Lin;Chai, Liang;Wang, Feng;Xu, Ya-Ping;Zhou, Shui-Hong;Fu, Yong;
Vol. 17 , No. 6 , pp. 5536-5544
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ursolic acid suppresses the invasive potential of colorectal cancer cells by regulating the TGF-β1/ZEB1/miR-200c signaling pathway.
Zhang, Ling;Cai, Qiao-Yan;Liu, Jianxin;Peng, Jun;Chen, You-Qin;Sferra, Thomas J;Lin, Jiu-Mao;
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 3274-3282
337 views DOI Abstract
2020
RAB6C is an independent prognostic factor of estrogen receptor‑positive/progesterone receptor‑negative breast cancer
Fohlin, H.
Vol. 19 , pp. 52-60
308 views DOI
2019
NOS1 upregulates ABCG2 expression contributing to DDP chemoresistance in ovarian cancer cells
Li, X.
Vol. 17 , pp. 1595-1602
305 views DOI
2019
Correlation between cytotoxicity in cancer cells and free radical-scavenging activity: evaluation of 57 medicinal and edible plant extracts.
Sammar, Marei;Abu-Farich, Basheer;Rayan, Ibrahim;Falah, Mizied;Rayan, Anwar;
Vol. 18 , No. 6 , pp. 6563-6571
303 views DOI Abstract
2015
cardiovascular complications (diseases) in chronic renal failure. part i
;O. Taran
Vol. 5 , No. 3.13 , pp. 113-115
278 views DOI Abstract
View All 39 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.