Indexed in Journament

fresenius environmental bulletin

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,620 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
46 Articles
Scores higher than 9.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name fresenius environmental bulletin
Abbreviated Name fresenius environmental bulletin

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 36.0
Community Impact 2.1
Content Distribution 70.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 26.3
Innovation 36.0 24.1
Community Impact 2.1 4.3
Content Distribution 70.8 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (46)

2013
cómo impulsar la innovación intraemprendedora en organizaciones que aprenden.
;Manuel Alfonso Garzón Castrillón
Vol. 3 , No. 3-4-5 , pp. 63-98
428 views Abstract
2011
desarrollo de la innovación tecnológica en chile: antecedentes y desafíos estratégicos.
;Gabriel Antonio Ramírez Méndez
Vol. 12 , No. 19 , pp. 107-132
380 views Abstract
2008
administración estratégica de la producción: modelo con base en la matriz de tecnología una herramienta de planeación y control de la productividad.
;Gabriel Turbay Bernal
Vol. 10 , No. 15 , pp. 125-136
371 views Abstract
2010
aplicaciones territoriales de la gestión del conocimiento. sus relaciones con la competitividad de las ciudades.
;Ramon Sanguino Galvan
Vol. 7 , No. 9 , pp. 9-41
361 views Abstract
2014
exceso de confianza y optimismo en las decisiones de presupuesto de capital: las finanzas corporativas desde un enfoque centrado en el comportamiento.
;Alejandro José Useche Arévalo
Vol. 16 , No. 26 , pp. 95-116
355 views DOI Abstract
2008
aproximaciones a la administración de identidades y economía de la cultura: provocación a una exploración de sentidos relacionales (parte 1).
;Winston Licona Calpe
Vol. 10 , No. 14 , pp. 111-128
355 views Abstract
2005
the intrapreneur innovation:led by medium and small size companies‘managers*(qualitative research)
;Manuel Alfonso Garzón Castrillón
Vol. 7 , No. 8 , pp. 31-55
333 views Abstract
2009
continuo pendular de la investigación en la administración internacional de las organizaciones: del positivismo funcionalista a la investigación cualitativa y etnográfica.
;José G. Vargas Hernández
Vol. 11 , No. 16 , pp. 113-149
325 views Abstract
2007
el paradigma competitivo: aspectos fundamentales de la ideología y las prácticas predominantes en economía y gestión.
;Andrés Guillermo Hernández Martínez
Vol. 9 , No. 13 , pp. 131-154
322 views Abstract
2010
Enhanced bisphenol a biodegradation by pseudomonas sp. In the surficial sediments extracted with (nh<inf>4</inf>)<inf>2</inf>c<inf>2</inf>o<inf>4</inf>
Li D.
Vol. 19 , pp. 2543-2547
321 views
2020
Accumulation and health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Amik Plain, Antakya, Turkey
Karanlik, S.
Vol. 29 , pp. 10621-10631
73 views
2020
SOIL QUALITY and ORGANIC CARBON STOCK across the DIFFERENT LAND USE in A MOUNTAINOUS LANDSCAPE of KARAKORAM REGION, GILGIT, PAKISTAN
Begum, F.
Vol. 29 , pp. 503-508
213 views
2020
MOLECULAR MARKER BASED GENETIC VARIABILITY among ELITE HEXAPLOID WHEAT GERMPLASM of GILGIT BALTISTAN
Bibi, S.
Vol. 29 , pp. 2055-2061
173 views
2020
Natural occurrence of aflatoxin B<inf>1</inf> in dry fruits of Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan
Ali, S.
Vol. 29 , pp. 2818-2822
35 views
2018
In vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the five different solvent extracts of Centaurea pulcherrima var. Freynii from Turkey
Ozcan K.
Vol. 27 , pp. 4047-4051
281 views
2017
a cognitive, emotional and behavioral assessment of colombian entrepreneurs attitudes toward corruption
;Gustavo Adolfo Gil Angel;Jose Manuel Saiz Alvarez;Jorge Alberto Gamez Gutierrez
Vol. 19 , No. 33 , pp. 9-51
301 views DOI Abstract
2016
la organización informal y sus efectos en las capacidades de innovación
;Cristina López González;Pedro Antonio Díaz Fúnez;Jorge Robledo Velásquez
Vol. 17 , No. 28 , pp. 191-217
254 views DOI Abstract
2016
Índice periódico por volumen (información de los números anteriores)
;Mauricio Sanabria
Vol. 17 , No. 29 , pp. 279-287
133 views
2016
hacia un nuevo modelo de gestión del conocimiento caracterizado por la interacción de comunidades cognitivas
;Amanda Vargas Prieto
Vol. 17 , No. 28 , pp. 219-234
263 views DOI Abstract
2016
editorial
;Mauricio Sanabria
Vol. 17 , No. 28 , pp. 9-12
198 views Abstract
Journament Score
25.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,620 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

25.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

36.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.