antonie van leeuwenhoek | Journament

Journal Ranking

#28 / 33,718
⭐ Average
Overall Score
53.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
86
Accessibility
45
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 months ago

antonie van leeuwenhoek

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • βœ… Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • βœ… Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • βœ… No iframe limitations
  • βœ… Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • βœ… Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • βœ… Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name anton van lee j m s
Abbreviated Name avljms
ISSN 1572-9699
Aim and Scope This journal publishes papers on fundamental and applied aspects of microbiology. Topics of particular interest include: structure & development; biochemistry & molecular biology; taxonomy, physiology & metabolic studies; genetics; ecological studies; especially molecular ecology; marine microbiology; medical microbiology; molecular biological aspects of microbial pathogenesis and bioinformatics.
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/10482
Author Instructions https://www.editorialmanager.com/anto

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (260 total)

1995
Anaerobic digestion and wastewater treatment systems
Vol. 67 , No. 1 , pp. -
391 views Abstract
2020
Anaplasmataceae closely related to Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Neorickettsia helminthoeca from birds in Central Europe, Hungary.
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparative transcriptomic analysis identified differentially expressed genes and pathways involved in the interaction between Tremella fuciformis and Annulohypoxylon stygium.
333 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bacterial diversity in deep-sea sediments under influence of asphalt seep at the SΓ£o Paulo Plateau.
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Jiangella anatolica sp. nov. isolated from coastal lake soil.
319 views DOI Abstract
2016
Microbacterium rhizosphaerae sp. nov., isolated from a Ginseng field, South Korea
Vol. 110 , No. 1 , pp. 11-18
296 views DOI Abstract
2019
The applicability of gene sequencing and MALDI-TOF to identify less common gram-negative rods (Advenella, Castellaniella, Kaistia, Pusillimonas and Sphingobacterium) from environmental isolates.
295 views DOI Abstract
2020
Lactobacillus gastricus BTM 7 prevents intestinal colonization by biofilm forming Cronobacter sakazakii in Caenorhabditis elegans model host.
269 views DOI Abstract
1970
Phage-typing of Salmonella weltevreden based on lysogeny I. The phage-typing system
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 255-261
258 views DOI
2015
Erratum to: Tamlana nanhaiensis sp. nov., isolated from surface seawater collected from the South China Sea
Vol. 108 , No. 3 , pp. 801-801
255 views DOI
53
Overall
Average
86
45
30
40
55
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

53.1/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

85.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.