bmc microbiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3074 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

bmc microbiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name bmc microbiol
Abbreviated Name bmc microbiology
ISSN 1471-2180
Aim and Scope
URL https://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (54 total)

2018
Biodegradation of caffeine by whole cells of tea-derived fungi Aspergillus sydowii, Aspergillus niger and optimization for caffeine degradation
Zhou, Binxing;Ma, Cunqiang;Wang, Hongzhen;Xia, Tao;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
576 views Abstract
2018
Interrelation between Tween and the membrane properties and high pressure tolerance of Lactobacillus plantarum.
Reitermayer, Dominik;Kafka, Thomas A;Lenz, Christian A;Vogel, Rudi F;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 72
529 views DOI Abstract
2008
Identification of new genes in Sinorhizobium meliloti using the Genome Sequencer FLX system
Mao C;Evans C;Jensen RV;Sobral BW;;
Vol. 8 , pp. -
440 views Abstract
2019
Cross-resistance of the pathogenic fungus Alternaria alternata to fungicides with different modes of action.
Yang, Li-Na;He, Meng-Han;Ouyang, Hai-Bing;Zhu, Wen;Pan, Zhe-Chao;Sui, Qi-Jun;Shang, Li-Ping;Zhan, Jiasui;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 205
434 views DOI Abstract
2020
Nucleotide polymorphism assay for the identification of west African group Bacillus anthracis: a lineage lacking anthrose.
Zincke, Diansy;Norris, Michael H;Kurmanov, Berzhan;Hadfield, Ted L;Blackburn, Jason K;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 6
431 views DOI Abstract
2009
RotaC: A web-based tool for the complete genome classification of group A rotaviruses
Piet Maes;Jelle Matthijnssens;Mustafizur Rahman;Marc Van Ranst;Piet Maes;Jelle Matthijnssens;Mustafizur Rahman;Marc Van Ranst;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 1-4
425 views DOI Abstract
2009
RotaC: a web-based tool for the complete genome classification of group A rotaviruses
Maes P;Matthijnssens J;Rahman M;Van Ranst M;;
Vol. 9 , pp. -
396 views Abstract
2011
Development of an indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay applied to the Botrytis cinerea quantification in tissues of postharvest fruits.
Fernández-Baldo, Martín A;Fernández, Jorge G;Pereira, Sirley V;Messina, Germán A;Salinas, Eloy;Raba, Julio;Sanz Ferramola, María I;
Vol. 11 , pp. 220
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
The prevalence of the culturable human skin aerobic bacteria in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shami, Ashwag;Al-Mijalli, Samiah;Pongchaikul, Pisut;Al-Barrag, Ahmed;AbduRahim, Samah;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 189
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Newly isolated lactic acid bacteria from silage targeting biofilms of foodborne pathogens during milk fermentation.
Gavrilova, Elizaveta;Anisimova, Elizaveta;Gabdelkhadieva, Alsu;Nikitina, Elena;Vafina, Adel;Yarullina, Dina;Bogachev, Mikhail;Kayumov, Airat;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 248
368 views DOI Abstract
View All 54 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.