the journals of gerontology series a, biological sciences and medical sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8100 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
100
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

the journals of gerontology series a, biological sciences and medical sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name j gerontol a biol sci med sci
Abbreviated Name j gerontol a biol sci med sci
ISSN 1758-535X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (110 total)

2019
Specific Leisure Activities and Cognitive Functions Among the Oldest-Old: the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey.
Mao, Chen;Li, Zhi-Hao;Lv, Yue-Bin;Gao, Xiang;Kraus, Virginia Byers;Zhou, Jin-Hui;Wu, Xian-Bo;Shi, Wan-Ying;Li, Fu-Rong;Liu, Si-Min;Yin, Zhao-Xue;Zeng, Yi;Shi, Xiao-Ming;
414 views DOI Abstract
2020
Interactions between the aging gut microbiome and common geriatric giants: polypharmacy, frailty and dementia.
Gemikonakli, Gizem;Mach, John;Hilmer, Sarah Nicole;
368 views DOI Abstract
1998
Impact of chronic diseases on functional limitations in elderly Chinese aged 70 years and over: a cross-sectional and longitudinal survey.
Woo, J;Ho, S C;Yu, L M;Lau, J;Yuen, Y K;
Vol. 53 , No. 2 , pp. M102-6
351 views Abstract
2020
Associations Between Declining Physical and Cognitive Functions in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.
Okely, Judith A;Deary, Ian J;
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Allicin reversed the process of frailty in aging male Fischer 344 rats with osteoporosis.
Liu, Yang;You, Meigui;Shen, Jianwei;Xu, Yaping;Li, Lin;Wang, Dongtao;Yang, Yajun;
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
The real facts supporting Jeanne Calment as the oldest ever human.
Robine, Jean-Marie;Allard, Michel;Herrmann, François R;Jeune, Bernard;
333 views DOI Abstract
2017
Family and Marital Conflict Among Chinese Older Adults in the United States: The Influence of Personal Coping Resources.
Guo, Man;Dong, Xinqi;Tiwari, Agnes;
Vol. 72 , No. suppl_1 , pp. S50-S55
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
Non-cardiac-related morbidity, mobility limitation, and outcomes in older adults with heart failure.
Tisminetzky, Mayra;Gurwitz, Jerry H;Fan, Dongjie;Reynolds, Kristi;Smith, David H;Fouayzi, Hassan;Sung, Sue Hee;Goldberg, Robert;Go, Alan S;
308 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Prevalence of Orthostatic Hypotension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Saedon, N.
Vol. 75 , pp. 117-122
298 views DOI
2019
Baseline Characteristics of Participants in the ASPREE (Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly) Study.
McNeil, John J;Woods, Robyn L;Nelson, Mark R;Murray, Anne M;Reid, Christopher M;Kirpach, Brenda;Storey, Elsdon;Shah, Raj C;Wolfe, Rory S;Tonkin, Andrew M;Newman, Anne B;Williamson, Jeff D;Lockery, Jessica E;Margolis, Karen L;Ernst, Michael E;Abhayaratna, Walter P;Stocks, Nigel;Fitzgerald, Sharyn M;Trevaks, Ruth E;Orchard, Suzanne G;Beilin, Lawrence J;Donnan, Geoffrey A;Gibbs, Peter;Johnston, Colin I;Grimm, Richard H;, ;
296 views DOI
View All 110 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
100
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.