Indexed in Journament

the journals of gerontology series a, biological sciences and medical sciences

ISSN 1758-535X· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.3 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,089 of 29,298 scored journals (34,014 indexed)
161 Articles
Scores higher than 96.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j gerontol a biol sci med sci
Abbreviated Name j gerontol a biol sci med sci
ISSN 1758-535X

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 100.0
Diversity 61.1
Innovation 34.5
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 10.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility — 23.0
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 61.1 20.9
Innovation 34.5 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 4.1
Content Distribution 10.7 88.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (161)

2019
Specific Leisure Activities and Cognitive Functions Among the Oldest-Old: the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey.
Mao, Chen;Li, Zhi-Hao;Lv, Yue-Bin;Gao, Xiang;Kraus, Virginia Byers;Zhou, Jin-Hui;Wu, Xian-Bo;Shi, Wan-Ying;Li, Fu-Rong;Liu, Si-Min;Yin, Zhao-Xue;Zeng, Yi;Shi, Xiao-Ming;
463 views DOI Abstract
2020
Interactions between the aging gut microbiome and common geriatric giants: polypharmacy, frailty and dementia.
Gemikonakli, Gizem;Mach, John;Hilmer, Sarah Nicole;
431 views DOI Abstract
1998
Impact of chronic diseases on functional limitations in elderly Chinese aged 70 years and over: a cross-sectional and longitudinal survey.
Woo, J;Ho, S C;Yu, L M;Lau, J;Yuen, Y K;
Vol. 53 , No. 2 , pp. M102-6
401 views Abstract
2020
Associations Between Declining Physical and Cognitive Functions in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.
Okely, Judith A;Deary, Ian J;
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Allicin reversed the process of frailty in aging male Fischer 344 rats with osteoporosis.
Liu, Yang;You, Meigui;Shen, Jianwei;Xu, Yaping;Li, Lin;Wang, Dongtao;Yang, Yajun;
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
The real facts supporting Jeanne Calment as the oldest ever human.
Robine, Jean-Marie;Allard, Michel;Herrmann, François R;Jeune, Bernard;
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Non-cardiac-related morbidity, mobility limitation, and outcomes in older adults with heart failure.
Tisminetzky, Mayra;Gurwitz, Jerry H;Fan, Dongjie;Reynolds, Kristi;Smith, David H;Fouayzi, Hassan;Sung, Sue Hee;Goldberg, Robert;Go, Alan S;
348 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Prevalence of Orthostatic Hypotension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Saedon, N.
Vol. 75 , pp. 117-122
345 views DOI
2017
Family and Marital Conflict Among Chinese Older Adults in the United States: The Influence of Personal Coping Resources.
Guo, Man;Dong, Xinqi;Tiwari, Agnes;
Vol. 72 , No. suppl_1 , pp. S50-S55
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Baseline Characteristics of Participants in the ASPREE (Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly) Study.
McNeil, John J;Woods, Robyn L;Nelson, Mark R;Murray, Anne M;Reid, Christopher M;Kirpach, Brenda;Storey, Elsdon;Shah, Raj C;Wolfe, Rory S;Tonkin, Andrew M;Newman, Anne B;Williamson, Jeff D;Lockery, Jessica E;Margolis, Karen L;Ernst, Michael E;Abhayaratna, Walter P;Stocks, Nigel;Fitzgerald, Sharyn M;Trevaks, Ruth E;Orchard, Suzanne G;Beilin, Lawrence J;Donnan, Geoffrey A;Gibbs, Peter;Johnston, Colin I;Grimm, Richard H;, ;
323 views DOI
2026
Acceptance of AI-Based Assistive Technologies for Autonomy Support Among Older Adults: A Scoping Review
Sekou Oumarou Thera, Ali Ben Charif, Jeanne Bertona, P. Villani, Sébastien Lechevallier, Marc‐Karim Bendiane, Anne-Laure Couderc
DOI Abstract
2026
Performance of Claims-based Frailty Indices in Medicare Advantage and Fee-for-Service Populations
Lan Luo, Kevin Pritchard, Chan Mi Park, Xiecheng Chen, Eunji G Kim, Ellen P. McCarthy, Dae Hyun Kim, Sandra M Shi
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Performance of Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse Algorithms in Medicare Advantage and Fee-For-Service Populations
Chan Mi Park, Xiecheng Chen, Sandra Shi, Lan Luo, Eunji G Kim, Emilie D. Duchesneau, Lily Zhong, Dae Hyun Kim, Ellen P. McCarthy
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Performance of Claims-based Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Algorithms in Medicare Advantage and Fee-for-Service Populations
You Wu, Chan Mi Park, Xiecheng Chen, Lan Luo, Eunji G Kim, Sandra M Shi, Dae Hyun Kim, Ellen P. McCarthy
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Wife-Husband Differences in the Associations Between Sleep Durations and Global Cognition Among Middle-Aged and Older Married Couples in China: A Longitudinal Dyadic Analysis
Jie Zhong, Ying Dai, Xiang Qi, Wei Liang
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Social Isolation, Loneliness, and Cognitive Decline Among Black Americans: The Moderating Role of Neighborhood Context
Ann W. Nguyen, Chuwen Zhong, Kedong Ding, Cleothia Frazier, Weidi Qin, Harry Owen Taylor
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
DNA methylation variability provides a complementary epigenetic signature of aging heterogeneity: Findings from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging and the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Olga Vishnyakova, Joosung Min, Ann Zenobia Moore, Toshiko Tanaka, Luigi Ferrucci, Xiaowei Song, Kenneth Rockwood, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Lloyd T. Elliott
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
The modifying effect of work-care role conflict on the effectiveness of carer support: Results from the Australian Draw Care randomised clinical trial
D. Mortimer, Thu Ha Dang, Antonia Thodis, Joanne Enticott, Yuan Tian, Simona Markusevska, Josefine Antoniades, Tuan Anh Nguyen, Andrew Simon Gilbert, Mary Gurgone, Nalika Ulapane, Claudia Cooper, Nilmini Wickramasinghe, Lily Dongxia Xiao, Briony Dow, Mathew Varghese, Santosh Loganathan, Bianca Brijnath
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Aging-Related Diseases in the U.S. Population: A Data-Driven Approach Using All of Us Electronic Health Record Data
Buwei He, Matthew Lohman, Stephanie Aghamoosa, Tiejun Zhang, Bankole Olatosi, Jiajia Zhang
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Longitudinal Trajectories of Hospitalizations in U.S. Older Adults with Heart Failure
Hanzhang Xu, Radha Dhingra, Bradley G. Hammill, Zhen Li, Scott M. Lynch, Jessica West, Michael D. Green, Eric D. Peterson, Lesley H Curtis, Matthew E Dupre
6 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
41.3/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,089 of 29,298 scored
(34,014 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

61.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

34.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

10.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.